Q1: Can anyone give a further explanation on this sentence?
Each time $f_o$ is a multiple of $F_s$, the argument of the exponential is a multiple of $2\pi$
Q2: - must $f_o$ be a multiple of $F_s$?
Q1: Can anyone give a further explanation on this sentence?
Each time $f_o$ is a multiple of $F_s$, the argument of the exponential is a multiple of $2\pi$
Q2: - must $f_o$ be a multiple of $F_s$?
Your first question:
Can anyone give a further explanation on this sentence? “Each time $f_o$ is a multiple of $F_s$, the argument of the exponential is a multiple of $2\pi$”
This is a simple result based on the provided expression: $$e^{j2\pi \left[\frac{f_o}{F_s}\right]n}$$
Let $f_o = mF_s$, where $m$ is an integer, then: $$e^{j2\pi \left[\frac{f_o}{F_s}\right]n}$$ $$e^{j2\pi \left[\frac{mF_s}{F_s}\right]n}$$ $$e^{j2\pi mn}$$ and now the term in the exponent is equal to $j2\pi$ times an integer $mn$.
Your second question:
And another question - must $f_o$ be a multiple of $F_s$?
No, $f_o$ is unconstrained subject to the answer to your first question.