1
$\begingroup$

I have an I-Q data of QPSK modulation, the data is is smeared and I have to correct the phase offset that causes the smearing problem, how can I apply the Phased-locked loop or the Costas loop on this stage of I-Q data to correct the phase offset problem.enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This question is a bit too broad – you already know that you need a phase correction, so apply it. You don't tell us what your problem is, or at least in what framework you're working, etc. This is a bit like calling your uncle, who's a car mechanic and telling him "I want to build a car. I know I need to add a motor, but how do I do that?"; you will need to give us a lot more background. I'm pretty sure someone can help you - just give us more of a chance to do so :) $\endgroup$ – Marcus Müller Jun 13 '16 at 21:34
  • $\begingroup$ Are you asking how to implement a Costas Loop as that would certainly track out an arbitrary phase offset? The other approach that may be easier depending on your implementation is to square your signal twice (^4), which will remove the modulation and leave you with a fixed carrier (at 4x your carrier frequency)- without the modulation present you can more simply measure your phase error as the error term into a PLL. $\endgroup$ – Dan Boschen Jun 14 '16 at 3:16
2
$\begingroup$

Assuming we have timing recovery resolved (meaning our system knows the correct time locations for our symbol decisions), then we can use the decided symbols along with our pre-decision values in a Decision-Directed Phase Detector. This will give us an error value that we can then feed into a phase lock loop to correct for phase error using traditional PLL methods.

Decision Directed Phase Detector

See my figure below for the implementation of a decision directed phase detector. The two vectors shown are the complex sample before making a decision ($V_2$), and the complex sample after the decision, which represents the closest location for each symbol in our locked constellation ($V_1). For QPSK, the normalized decisions would be 0.707 ± j0.707.

enter image description here

This describes a very simple approach to get a phase error term for QPSK (and higher order QAM systems) as an implementation of the phase discriminator. This is in fact a compact representation of the phase detector in the Costas Loop for a QPSK demodulator. The rest of the work for tracking assumes that you have knowledge in Digital PLL implementations to "close the loop" and is not covered here.

To explain the Decision Directed Phase Detector further for those extremely interested, I detailed below the more generic "cross product phase detector". Understanding this will give us full insight into the operation summarized in the figure above.

Cross Product Phase Detector

The cross product phase detector works based on the property that the imaginary portion (cross product) of a complex conjugate multiplication of two vectors is directly proportional to the sine of the phase angle between the vectors. This has wide utility in digital carrier and phase tracking algorithms. The easy way to see this is knowing that when we multiply two vectors, the angles add; so if we conjugate one of the vectors, the angles will subtract giving us the difference of the two angles.

enter image description here

The math for the actual complex conjugate multiplication reveals how simple the final implementation can be (two real multiplies and an add), which is what makes this approach so prevalent:

Consider two vectors $V_1$ and $V_2$

$V1= I_1+jQ_1$

$V2= I_2+jQ_2$

$V_1^*V_2 = (I_1-jQ_1)(I_2+jQ_2) = (I_1I_2+Q1Q2) + j(I_1Q_2-I_2Q_1) = I_P+jQ_P$

The angle of the result is $\phi = atan2(Q_P,I_P)$

However in most cases for this application the processing intensive atan2 is not necessary, as we can make use of certain approximations as follows:

First the imaginary term $Q_P$ is proportional to the sine of the angle:

$Q_P = |V_1||V_2|sin(\phi)$

The proportionality constant just becomes part of our overall loop gain; for a phase detector we just need something that is linearly proportional to phase.

Second for small angles, $sin(\phi) \approx \phi$

A loop would drive the angle (error) to 0, therefore when tracking the angle will be small, so this approximation is valid for assessing the tracking performance of the loop. For acquisition considerations, we need to be aware of the reduced loop gain due to the changing slope of a sine function (unless calculating an atan which has the benefit of being linear throughout its range).

So bottom line for a cross product phase detector we take advantage of the following relationship between the I and Q values of two complex samples:

Given two complex samples [$I_1,Q_1$] and [$I_2,Q_2$], the cross product of the two samples is proportional to the phase between them:

$I_1Q_2-I_2Q_1 \propto \phi$

Thus we have provided a very simple and elegant way to provide phase discrimination in an all-digital PLL.

Note: The following result is rotation invariant, meaning if the constellation rotates past 45 degree error, it will lock in another position. A known training sequence (in the header) would be required to establish the correct orientation for your packet of data.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.