1
$\begingroup$

As far as I have grasped the concept,

$$ y[n] = \left( 2 x[n] - x^2[n] \right)^2 $$

is a memoryless system because even if we give negative values of $n$, we still get the overall result in the positive sign, right?

And the following expression is memorable system because we get the negative answer for negative values of $n$, right?

$$y[n] = \left( 2 x[n] - x^2[n] \right)$$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Memorable? Memorable?? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 5, 2021 at 12:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That's memoryfulitude $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 5, 2021 at 23:40

2 Answers 2

4
$\begingroup$

Confusion may arise, for causal systems, from mistaking "having negative signal values (amplitudes)" and "depending on negative time indices".

A strict memory-less system depends neither on past (for the causal case) nor on future values of the input but on current ones to determine the current value of the output. The output at $n$ only depends on inputs at $n$. For a strict memory-less and causal system, you could not depend on former (negative, in a way relative to the current index) time indices.

By extension, some allow memory-less systems to have a constant delay, i.e., to hold only one value at a given lag: the output at $n$ only depends on inputs at $n-k$ with a fixed integer $k$. So, in general, a memory-less system can have the following form, with $k$ any integer:

$$y[n] = f(x[n-k])\,.$$

For realizable causal systems that cannot look ahead in the future, only $k \ge 0$ are allowed.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Hi! is it, "...it does not depend either on A or on B..." OR " it depends neither on A nor B..." $\endgroup$
    – Fat32
    Commented Sep 18, 2018 at 9:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thx, my leaking English... $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 18, 2018 at 9:10
0
$\begingroup$

The memoryless system means a system which does not use past values of the input. There is nothing to do with the sign of your output. That just means there isn't any storage element in your system.

Although reverse is not necessarily true every time, that implies also casuality.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.