0
$\begingroup$

I was reading from Athanosios Papoulis' "The Fourier integral and its applications." and they referenced the bilateral Laplace transform and Fourier Transform as:

$$F(p)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-pt}f(t)dt$$ $$F(\omega)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-j\omega t}f(t)dt$$

and stability indicates that the real part of $p$ must lie between $a$ an $b$.(For stability I'm guessing?)

As per the textbook, if we take the values of $p$ to be purely real and ignore the imaginary axis, then $F(\omega)$ doesn't even exist.

logically, I can't see how that could happen. I was wondering if anyone could explain how that is so. As well as why we limit the real part of $p$.(guessing it's similar to the unit circle in Z transform).

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ sorry about the formatting of integral, Not sure how to express it as formula on the site $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 11, 2018 at 17:23
  • $\begingroup$ Take a look at how I formatted the formulas, so you can do it yourself the next time. $\endgroup$
    – Matt L.
    Commented Jul 11, 2018 at 18:58

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The bilateral Laplace transform converges in a vertical strip $a<\text{Re}\{p\}<b$, called the region of convergence (ROC). Compare this to the bilateral $\mathcal{Z}$-transform which converges in an annulus centered at the origin of the complex plane: $r_1<|z|<r_2$. For causal signals we have $b=\infty$ and $r_2=\infty$.

If the vertical strip $a<\text{Re}\{p\}<b$ does not include the imaginary axis, i.e., if $0<a<b$ or $a<b<0$, the bilateral Laplace transform does not converge for $p=j\omega$ because the imaginary axis is not inside the ROC. Consequently, the Fourier transform does not exist because the corresponding integral does not converge. For the $\mathcal{Z}$-transform the analogous case would be that the ROC does not include the unit circle, in which case the discrete time Fourier transform does not exist.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you Matt, somehow my mind never went that far ahead. Also, I have been out of touch with by Signal Processing since quite a bit and need to brush up on these stability criteria. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 14, 2018 at 11:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.