1
$\begingroup$

I'm studying for an exam and this is an old exam question that I don't understand:

Is the following system non-minimum phase?

$$G(s) = \frac{e^{-2s}}{s+2}$$

I can see that the real part of the pole is on the left half plane, but regarding the zeros I don't know what to do. If plotting $e^{-2s}$ it seem to never cross the x-axis, so I thought it didn't have a zero at all, and thus no zero/pole is in the right half plane $\rightarrow$ the system is minimum phase. But the correct answer was apparently that the system is non-minimum phase, and the explanation was "contains a time-lag". How was I supposed to think?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

A linear time-invariant system is said to be minimum-phase if the system and its inverse are 1) causal and 2) stable.

In your case the inverse of the time-delay $e^{-2s}$ makes the inverse non-causal; hence not minimum phase.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.