0
$\begingroup$

How to tune constellations mapping M ary-psk or x-qam to reduce PAPR ?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ that feels like homework, especially the x-PSK part is a trick question. $\endgroup$ Commented May 21, 2020 at 20:05

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Peak to Average Power Ratio (PAPR) is defined as:

$$ \text{PAPR} = \frac{\text{Peak Power}}{\text{Average Power}} $$

If you're working with a $M$-PSK constellation, then the peak power is $P_s$ and the average power is also $P_s$ assuming each symbol is equally likely. For $M$-PSK, the $\text{PAPR}=1$.

If you working a $M$-QAM constellation, then the peak power is $\text{max}_{i \in \mathbb{C}} |s_i|^2$, where $\mathbb{C}$ is the constellation. Again assuming all the symbols are equally likely, the average power is $\frac{1}{M}\sum_{i \in \mathbb{C}} |s_i|^2$. The specifics should be worked out for a constellation but is hard to write down because in general there are many possible QAM constellations.

One thing that is directly clear is that $\text{PAPR}_{\text{QAM}}>\text{PAPR}_{\text{PSK}}$. In a QAM constellation, you have some symbols with less power, some symbols with more power, and there is an average somewhere in between. The point is that there are some symbols with more power, and this makes the peak power part of PAPR greater than the average power part. This is in contrast to a PSK constellation, where the symbols lie on a circle and no symbol has more or less power than each other.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Along with the arrangement of the constellation points, there is also the trajectory of the signal through the constellation which can overshoot the points themselves. This page has a discussion and nice visuals for overshoot in a PSK example: qsl.net/pe1jok/commtheory.html $\endgroup$
    – Andy Walls
    Commented May 21, 2020 at 19:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.