Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with bandwidth
Search options not deleted
user 4376
the difference between the upper and lower frequencies in a contiguous set of frequencies
2
votes
Accepted
Why does QASK with a same bitrate as BASK use only half of the bandwidth?
What you have to think about is how efficiently you can send bits over a fixed bandwidth with both schemes given the facts given above. … +a_i \sin(2 \pi 75 t) + + a_n \sin(2 \pi 100 t)$$
now $s_1(t)$ has a bandwidth that is half of the bandwidth of $s(t)$. …
- 326