1
$\begingroup$

I've been given an audio signal with some high frequency noise. The professor gave me the system function of a lowpass filter that gives me control over the cutoff frequency:

$$H(z)=\frac{1-\alpha}{2}\frac{1+z^{-1}}{1-\alpha z^{-1}}$$

where $\alpha=\frac{1-\sin \omega_c}{\cos \omega_c}$ and $\omega_c$ is the cutoff frequency in radians/sec.

The professor claims that if the filter is cascaded with itself $L$ times, it becomes a filter of order $L$.

My questions are the following:

  1. What does increasing the order of the filter do?
  2. Why would I want to increase the order of the filter?
  3. If I cascade the filter with itself $L$ times, won't I lose the ability to control the cutoff frequency? How could I correct for this?

edit:

Here's what I get for the frequency response of the filter when the cutoff frequency is set to 1000 Hz. Sampling frequency is 16000 Hz.

enter image description here

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
12
  • $\begingroup$ Hi! very nice question. Do you have access to signal processing software Matlab or Octave ? $\endgroup$
    – Fat32
    Commented Oct 30, 2018 at 18:40
  • $\begingroup$ @Fat32 Yes, MATLAB is what I am using. $\endgroup$
    – user50420
    Commented Oct 30, 2018 at 18:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ yes you are right. If you define the cutoff frequency as the -3 dB point wrt to the origin $|H(0)|$ magnitude (which is 0 dB for all orders), then the -3dB point is moving to the DC as the order is increasing. You have probably misunderstood something about the filter or the cutoff frequency. As a rule, when the order is increased the filter becomes steeper, you can see this if you plot the two curves on the same y-axis scale.. $\endgroup$
    – Fat32
    Commented Oct 30, 2018 at 19:27
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Fat32 great teaching effort $\endgroup$
    – Laurent Duval
    Commented Oct 30, 2018 at 19:32
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @user50420 As Fat32 says, you don't lose the ability to set the cutoff frequency, you just need to figure out how to calculate it. Hint: if one filter stage has gain $|G_0|$ at frequency $f_0$, two cascaded stages will have gain $|G_0|^2$ at the same frequency. $\endgroup$
    – MBaz
    Commented Oct 30, 2018 at 22:57

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
2
$\begingroup$

Replace your $\alpha$ with the following to see if it helps:

fs = 16000;
fc = 3500;
wc = 2*pi*fc/fs;

L = 5;            % order of the cascade
B = 2^((L-1)/L);
C = cos(wc);
M = B-C-1;
N = 1+C-B*C;
alfa = ( -N + sqrt( N*N - M*M ) )/M;

I've got the following plots, compared to your posted $\alpha$ calculation.

enter image description here

enter image description here

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
0
1
$\begingroup$

The filter has one kernel, and adding L filters (in series) makes the input of the first filter appear convolved, L times, with the same kernel, and repeated convolution leads to a Gaussian response. It's no different than synchronous tuned filters.

If you'd want to increase the order then you'd, most probably, need a steeper rolloff, tighter attenuation, better ripple (if there's the case), etc. In this case, repeating the same stage over and over again, does not achieve these for the fact mentioned above.

As for the ability to control fc, not much you can do about it this way, only by properly calculating the filter to be of a higher order, which starts with imposing the design requirements, first, and see where that leads you. Not designing a basic filter for a given set of parameters, then repeatedly placing it over and over again. This is just the professor's way of making you think outside the box.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.