0
$\begingroup$

I have two discrete time signals $x_1[n] = 2\sin\left(\frac{2\pi 3.5n}{64}\right)$ and $x_2[n] = \cos\left(\frac{9n}{64}\right)$

I have to calculate the normalized angular frequencies.

What I have are:

normalized angular freq. of $x_1[n]$ is $\frac{2\pi 3.5n}{64}$ with sampling frequency being 64 and $f_0 = 3.5$ and the normalized angular frequency is defined to be $\frac{2\pi F}{Fs}$. $F$ here is equal to $f_o$.

Use the same argument the normalized angular freq. for $x_2[n]$ is $\frac{2\pi 6 }{64}$

EDIT extention question: $X_1[n]$ is periodic and $x_2[n]$ is not periodic

Is this correct?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The normalized angular frequency for $x_1[n]$ is $2\pi3.5/64$. $n$ is the sampling index so would not be included in the angular frequency. The units of normalized angular frequency are radians/sample, so we see for each sampling index $n$ the sinusoid will have indexed $2\pi3.5/64$ radians.

By the same consideration, the angular frequency for $x_2[n]$ is simply $9/64$ radians per sample.

Both $x_1[n]$ and $x_2[n]$ are samples of periodic sinusoidal functions, but we note in that case that it is the sinusoidal functions sampled that are periodic but not necessarily the sampled results themselves. For the case of $x_2[n]$, the resulting samples will never actually repeat again since $\pi$ is not a rational number and the sine and cosine functions repeat every $2\pi$ radians, so strictly speaking $x_2[n]$ is not periodic. Since we do have an integer ratio multiplied by $2\pi$ for the angle in $x_1[n]$, this will have results that will repeat exactly and is itself a periodic function, but that is not the case for $x_2[n]$!

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, strictly speaking, "periodic" means $x[n] = x[n+P]$ where $P$ is the period. So, by this strict definition, $x_2$ is not periodic, because $P$ must be an integer to have any sensible meaning. Even $x_1$ won't have the "right" period for its frequency. :-) $\endgroup$
    – Peter K.
    Commented Jun 14, 2022 at 17:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @PeterK. Yes agreed, I think I will change "would" to "could" as in "could be considered if we consider them as samples of a sinusoid, but even in that case it would be the sinusoid being sampled that is periodic and not the resulting samples! Great point on the periodicity of $x_1[n]$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 14, 2022 at 17:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.