Skip to main content
Signal Processing

Return to Question

Bumped by Community user
Tweeted twitter.com/StackSignals/status/891936577030688768
deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
Mostafa
Mostafa
  • 193
  • 1
  • 7

I read in "Discrete-Time Signal Processing" Reference, in transposed Direct Form II filters sectionssection, that it implements zeros first then poles(unlike Direct form II which implements zerospoles first), Which is important in the presence of quantization of finite precision or noise without adding further explanation.

Why implementing Zeros first is better than implementing poles first?

I read in "Discrete-Time Signal Processing" Reference, in transposed Direct Form II filters sections, that it implements zeros first then poles(unlike Direct form II which implements zeros first), Which is important in the presence of quantization of finite precision or noise without adding further explanation.

Why implementing Zeros first is better than implementing poles first?

I read in "Discrete-Time Signal Processing" Reference, in transposed Direct Form II filters section, that it implements zeros first then poles(unlike Direct form II which implements poles first), Which is important in the presence of quantization of finite precision or noise without adding further explanation.

Why implementing Zeros first is better than implementing poles first?

Source Link
Mostafa
Mostafa
  • 193
  • 1
  • 7

Transposed Direct Form II VS Direct Form II IIR filters?

I read in "Discrete-Time Signal Processing" Reference, in transposed Direct Form II filters sections, that it implements zeros first then poles(unlike Direct form II which implements zeros first), Which is important in the presence of quantization of finite precision or noise without adding further explanation.

Why implementing Zeros first is better than implementing poles first?