Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with tracking
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 10169
4
votes
Accepted
How to choose the "best" measurment (from a given set) as input for a kalman filter?
only residual but also uncertainty and represented as scalar value:
$$\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi S}}\exp [-\frac{1}{2}\mathbf y^\mathsf T\mathbf S^{-1}\mathbf y]$$
Problem: For an object tracking … of methods (you can google it and find more information):
- Global nearest neighbour (in Euclidean space);
- Global strongest neighbour;
- Joint probability data association;
- Multiple hypothesis tracking …
- 388
0
votes
Structuring Kalman filter for tracking problem where only position is known
I'm new to Kalman filters
I'm new too.
I have no other information (for example, regarding velocity or acceleration).
This is a common situation.
The path of the target is completely random as it …
- 388