0
$\begingroup$

I understand that a signal that is white noise is stationary (or more properly that the process generating it is stationary).

What if the white noise is delivered as a single pulse or a series of pulses with silence between them? Is that still stationary, or does the pulsatility suddenly convert this into a non-stationary system?

If it is no longer stationary, is there a term of art conveying the information that the signal within the pulse is stationary (e.g., a pure tone or white noise) rather than a non-stationary natural or musical sound?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

The pulsed process is not stationary. You can use the term "quasi-stationary" to describe a process that looks stationary in short time scales (e.g. during silence, or in the middle of a pulse).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What I really want is a term that excludes audio signals generated by a stationary process, whether the signal is subsequently pulsed or continuous, but includes all other kinds of audio signals. I can't quite get away with "signals that are not stationary and not quasi-stationary" -- can you think of a phrase that would meet the need? $\endgroup$ – Craig.Feied Jun 8 at 21:25
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not sure I understand: basically you can classify most signals as "stationary", "non-stationary" and "quasi-stationary", where "quasi-stationary" is a fuzzy term that means "the signal is mathematically non-stationary but we'll say it is stationary over the time frames we're interested in". Does that help? $\endgroup$ – MBaz Jun 9 at 15:45
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that helps. Thank you $\endgroup$ – Craig.Feied Jun 10 at 17:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.