1
$\begingroup$

This question is really related to - is there any need for IFFT in the first place?

If we want to send a bunch of complex-numbers (vectors), then most OFDM discussions involve presenting those numbers to an IFFT block, and the output of the IFFT block will then have a bunch of complex numbers for which to transmit in a queued fashion through a QAM block.

Can I ask ----- is the IFFT block really necessary? Instead of using the IFFT block, is it possible to just place the original set of complex numbers (vectors) on the queue....and then transmit those numbers (real and imaginary components) - one at a time - through a QAM block?

The signal (without using IFFT) is still going to be OFDM, right?

Thanks for any comments/advice!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The IFFT does exactly what you describe on the third paragraph of your question. The misconception is at "...the output of the IFFT block will then have a bunch of complex numbers...". Yes, this is true, but these are now in the time domain and basically, your I-Q. All mixed and ready. Check output of Inverse FFT for a single input in the frequency domain, at some frequency $k$. $\endgroup$ – A_A May 23 '18 at 6:38
  • $\begingroup$ @Kenny, you can throw away IFFT block if the channel is something like AWGN. But if channel is frequency selective, IFFT and FFT assure the orthogonality of subcarriers thus channel equalization is simplified to one-tap. $\endgroup$ – AlexTP May 23 '18 at 8:27
  • $\begingroup$ It is true that the output of IFFT is just complex numbers, but these numbers behave well if we pass them through FIR filer that model frequency selective channels. $\endgroup$ – AlexTP May 23 '18 at 8:33
  • $\begingroup$ Hello A_A! --- your comment about "but these are now in the time domain and basically, your I-Q. All mixed and ready." Thanks for that. Although..... the original raw complex numbers (before going into the IFFT) have in-phase and quadrature components as well. That's kind of the same as the IFFT output complex numbers....each one having I and Q components as well. The main difference I can think of (only) is that each IFFT complex number is a combination of every raw original complex number. $\endgroup$ – Kenny May 24 '18 at 21:41
  • $\begingroup$ Hello Alex...... I think that I understand what you and hotpaw are saying. My latest understanding (interpretation) is that if we send the raw complex numbers via QAM, then a frequency selective channel can totally wipe out 1 or more values (and also - queuing raw complex values into a QAM does not result in OFDM?). On the other hand, each IFFT output value is a combination of every raw complex value, which improves chances of recovering each original raw value (at the receiving side)..... is that right? Thanks Alex. $\endgroup$ – Kenny May 24 '18 at 21:49
1
$\begingroup$

The “O” in OFDM stands for orthogonal. The IFFT takes a complex number (1 bin of the input) and turns it into samples of a sinusoid of a frequency that, over a certain length (of time), is orthogonal to (and thus, under ideal linear conditions, won’t interfere with) any other frequency subcarrier output by the IFFT.

If you just transmit the original bits, the impulse response of the channel can smear the bits together, interfering with the adjacent bits, and leave the decoder/demodulator the interesting job of unscrambling this mess. Depending on the channel response and how it changes over time, this may or may not be more difficult to do.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks very much for your excellent comments AA, Alex and hotpaw! I think I'm starting to get the picture now. Let me see if I have this right. If I have the raw (not IFFT) set of complex values (ie. vectors), V1, V2, V3 etc. And if I split each one into their real and complex parts, and then use each part to modulate orthogonal carriers....eg. Re1.cos(wt) and Im1.sin(wt), then send them out in QAM fashion, such as Re1.cos(wt) + Im1.sin(wt); and then proceed to switch to R2.cos(wt) and Im2.sin(wt).etc...is that OFDM? Cyclic prefix won't help here, right? Thanks again! $\endgroup$ – Kenny May 23 '18 at 8:54
  • $\begingroup$ Does this mean that non-IFFT complex sequence values (such as raw vector symbols in real/imag voltage form from a 4-QAM system) modulating two orthogonal carriers (in QAM style, and in a time-queued clocked fashion) won't have the features or qualities of the IFFT complex sequence values modulating those same two orthogonal carriers? I'm very appreciative of the comments from all of you. The internet is amazing. Years ago, before the internet, I believe I'd have a really hard time getting my bearings straight with topics like this. Thanks again. $\endgroup$ – Kenny May 23 '18 at 9:04
  • $\begingroup$ hotpaw!! Thanks very much. I believe I'm getting the picture now, after what you mentioned. So applying the original (raw, non-IFFT) values to a QAM (in queued fashion) is QAM, and not OFDM. But doing the same thing with the IFFT block output complex values (ie. applying to a QAM block) is OFDM. I'm leaving cyclic prefix out of the discussion. What you indicated makes sense. I think I wrongly assumed that queuing up a sequence of complex values into a QAM block was generating OFDM. Thanks for your help again!! Absolutely appreciated. $\endgroup$ – Kenny May 23 '18 at 9:12
  • $\begingroup$ Hotpaw..... could you please explain "won’t interfere with any other frequency subcarrier output by the IFFT"? The IFFT outputs "N" complex numbers, right? And when we transmit each complex value (real and imaginary style) one at a time - using quadrature amplitude method (QAM) - then the equivalent spectrum of the signal will appear as N orthogonal sub-carriers, right? Thanks hotpaw! $\endgroup$ – Kenny May 23 '18 at 21:23
  • $\begingroup$ OFDM works on blocks of data (long vectors of some bandwidth, which can be decomposed), not "one at a time" bits. Think vertical (frequency bands) rather than stepping horizontally or lengthwise (in time). $\endgroup$ – hotpaw2 May 23 '18 at 21:33
0
$\begingroup$

I think you are comparing OFDM versus FSK. I agree with hotpaw2, and I just want to elaborate on his answer. If we build up a system using FSK, suppose the minimum spacing of the carriers is ft1. Then if this system is used at another environment with worse ISI, this system won't function well. We can't change the frequencies because the circuit is there. Of course, one can silence some of the carriers to make sure the new minimum spacing of the transmitting carriers meets the requirement. But compared with OFDM, this approach is ineffective in terms of data rate (or spectrum usage). OFDM deals with this problem by fine tuning the data rate with cyclic prefix.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

You can also transmit a block of QAM symbols with an appended CP using a single carrier and use a frequency-domain equalizer at the receiver to remove the ISI effects. Performance-wise it will be similar to OFDM but you would lose some OFDM features such as adaptive bit and power loading.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.