4
$\begingroup$

$Z(t) = A\cos(\omega t+\theta)$ where $A$~$\mathcal N(0,\sigma ^2) $ and $\theta $~$\mathcal U(0,2\pi)$ are independent.

I'm trying to figure out if $Z(t)$ is a Gaussian random process and whether it is strict sense stationary. It is easy to see that it is WSS, but I can't figure out about the SSS and whether it is a Gaussian process. It does look like to me that for every chosen time $t$ I get some kind of a normal random variable multiplied by a constant per $\theta$ and therefore it is a Gaussian process, but I can't seem to prove nor disprove it. Can someone clarify this for me? Thanks.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

I'm pretty sure that even algebraically, $Z$ will not be Gaussian. You're multiplying a Gaussian by a random variable that has a distribution that is effectively the histogram of a (co)sine function.

enter image description here

Let's do it empirically, though, following the example here.

Looking first at the densities, you can see that the density estimate for $Z$ (red) is much more central than that of $A$ (green).

enter image description here

Plotting the qqnorm and qqline plots for both, are below. As you can see, the one for $Z$ does not coincide much with the red line.

First, for $A$: Plot for $A$

Then, for $Z$: Plot for $Z$

Regarding stationarity: the signal $Z$ is not stationary at all because it is cyclostationary.


R Code Below

# 28338
T <- 10000
sigma  <- 1

A <- rnorm(T,0,sigma)
theta <- runif(1,0, 2 * pi)

fs <- 100
t <- (1:T)/fs
omega <- 2* pi * 0.0892987
Z <- A * cos(omega*t + theta)

# First diagram
hist(sin(omega*t))

# Second diagram
dA <- density(A)
dZ <- density(Z)
plot(dZ, col="red", lwd=5)
lines(dA, col="green", lwd=5)

# Third diagram
qqnorm(A)
qqline(A, col = 2)

# Fourth diagram
qqnorm(Z)
qqline(Z, col = 2)
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Hey, this is great, thank you for your comment Any thoughts on the SSS thing? $\endgroup$
    – user3921
    Commented Jan 19, 2016 at 7:38
  • $\begingroup$ @user3921 : I don't believe it is stationary at all, because it is cyclostationary. $\endgroup$
    – Peter K.
    Commented Jan 19, 2016 at 17:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.