Skip to main content
Signal Processing

Return to Question

grammar enhancements, added tag
Source Link
edit approved Jun 23, 2020 at 11:03
auspicious99
edit approved Jun 23, 2020 at 11:03
auspicious99
  • 248
  • 1
  • 2
  • 14

Even after having studied these for quite sometime, I tend to forget [if(if I'm out of touch for a while]while) how they are related to each other and what each stands for [since(since they have such similar sounding names]names). I'm hoping you'd come up with an explanation that is so intuitive and mathematically beautiful that they'll get embedded into my memory for everforever and this thread will serve as a super quick refresher whenever I [or(or anyone else]else) needs it.

Even after having studied these for quite sometime, I tend to forget [if I'm out of touch for a while] how they are related to each other and what each stands for [since they have such similar sounding names]. I'm hoping you'd come up with an explanation that is so intuitive and mathematically beautiful that they'll get embedded into my memory for ever and this thread will serve as a super quick refresher whenever I [or anyone else] needs it.

Even after having studied these for quite sometime, I tend to forget (if I'm out of touch for a while) how they are related to each other and what each stands for (since they have such similar sounding names). I'm hoping you'd come up with an explanation that is so intuitive and mathematically beautiful that they'll get embedded into my memory forever and this thread will serve as a super quick refresher whenever I (or anyone else) needs it.

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackSignals/status/136177045523795968
added 91 characters in body
Source Link
Vighnesh
Vighnesh
  • 499
  • 5
  • 7

Even after having studied these for quite sometime, I tend to forget [if I'm out of touch for a while] how they are related to each other and what each stands for [since they have such similar sounding names]. I'm hoping you'd come up with an explanation that is so intuitive and mathematically beautiful that they'll get embedded into my memory for ever and this thread will serve as a super quick refresher whenever I [or anyone else] needs it.

Even after having studied these for quite sometime, I tend to forget [if I'm out of touch for a while] how they are related to each other and what each stands for [since they have such similar sounding names]. I'm hoping you'd come up with an explanation that is so intuitive and mathematically beautiful that they'll get embedded into my memory for ever.

Even after having studied these for quite sometime, I tend to forget [if I'm out of touch for a while] how they are related to each other and what each stands for [since they have such similar sounding names]. I'm hoping you'd come up with an explanation that is so intuitive and mathematically beautiful that they'll get embedded into my memory for ever and this thread will serve as a super quick refresher whenever I [or anyone else] needs it.

added 255 characters in body
Source Link
Vighnesh
Vighnesh
  • 499
  • 5
  • 7

In particularEven after having studied these for quite sometime, how would you describe the sameI tend to forget [if I'm out of touch for a DSP n00bwhile] how they are related to generate interest about the subjecteach other and what each stands for [since they have such similar sounding names]. I'm hoping you'd come up with an explanation that is so intuitive and mathematically beautiful that they'll get embedded into my memory for ever.

In particular, how would you describe the same to a DSP n00b to generate interest about the subject.

Even after having studied these for quite sometime, I tend to forget [if I'm out of touch for a while] how they are related to each other and what each stands for [since they have such similar sounding names]. I'm hoping you'd come up with an explanation that is so intuitive and mathematically beautiful that they'll get embedded into my memory for ever.

Source Link
Vighnesh
Vighnesh
  • 499
  • 5
  • 7