Not sure if this belongs on the Mathematics stack or here, but here goes.
For an accumulator, defined as shown in the image below, why would I define Bx=1$B_x=1$? u[n]$u[n]$ is defined at zero so my (possibly misguided intuition) is telling me that I'd choose Bx = 0$B_x = 0$ to not eliminate that point.
Not sure if this belongs on the Mathematics stack or here, but here goes.
For an accumulator, defined as shown in the image below, why would I define Bx=1? u[n] is defined at zero so my (possibly misguided intuition) is telling me that I'd choose Bx = 0 to not eliminate that point.
For an accumulator, defined as shown in the image below, why would I define $B_x=1$? $u[n]$ is defined at zero so my (possibly misguided intuition) is telling me that I'd choose $B_x = 0$ to not eliminate that point.
Not sure if this belongs on the Mathematics stack or here, but here goes.
For an accumulator, defined as shown in the image below, why would I define Bx=1? u[n] is defined at zero so my (possibly misguided intuition) is telling me that I'd choose Bx = 0 to not eliminate that point.
