Skip to main content
replaced http://dsp.stackexchange.com/ with https://dsp.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

I asked exact the same here one year ago: One year ago questionOne year ago question I asked this question again here, because after one year, I have learned more about DSP and am thinking ways to improve it.

Filter description

  • Filter input data rate is 64kHz

  • Filter output data rate is 0.5Hz - 2Hz

  • The filter is preferably to have bandwidth of 1mHz with very sharp transition area, since only DC is needed and the noises at 0-5Hz is large.

The answer I got

The averaging data is the best DC I can get. I bought this answer. However, it now becomes plausible to me, since a filter always have a bandwidth and frequency responses. Averaging is essentially a FIR with no superior characteristics.

Questions

  1. Shall the filter be designed in this way: 9 stages of halfband filters(64kHz -> 125Hz). Followed by three stages of cascaded integrator–comb (CIC) filters with R=5. Then the output will be fed into a 1st order IIR filter?

  2. Maybe 16 stages of halfband filters? (64kHz -> 0.9765625Hz) And then be fed into an IIR filter.

  3. How shall the filter be designed?

I asked exact the same here one year ago: One year ago question I asked this question again here, because after one year, I have learned more about DSP and am thinking ways to improve it.

Filter description

  • Filter input data rate is 64kHz

  • Filter output data rate is 0.5Hz - 2Hz

  • The filter is preferably to have bandwidth of 1mHz with very sharp transition area, since only DC is needed and the noises at 0-5Hz is large.

The answer I got

The averaging data is the best DC I can get. I bought this answer. However, it now becomes plausible to me, since a filter always have a bandwidth and frequency responses. Averaging is essentially a FIR with no superior characteristics.

Questions

  1. Shall the filter be designed in this way: 9 stages of halfband filters(64kHz -> 125Hz). Followed by three stages of cascaded integrator–comb (CIC) filters with R=5. Then the output will be fed into a 1st order IIR filter?

  2. Maybe 16 stages of halfband filters? (64kHz -> 0.9765625Hz) And then be fed into an IIR filter.

  3. How shall the filter be designed?

I asked exact the same here one year ago: One year ago question I asked this question again here, because after one year, I have learned more about DSP and am thinking ways to improve it.

Filter description

  • Filter input data rate is 64kHz

  • Filter output data rate is 0.5Hz - 2Hz

  • The filter is preferably to have bandwidth of 1mHz with very sharp transition area, since only DC is needed and the noises at 0-5Hz is large.

The answer I got

The averaging data is the best DC I can get. I bought this answer. However, it now becomes plausible to me, since a filter always have a bandwidth and frequency responses. Averaging is essentially a FIR with no superior characteristics.

Questions

  1. Shall the filter be designed in this way: 9 stages of halfband filters(64kHz -> 125Hz). Followed by three stages of cascaded integrator–comb (CIC) filters with R=5. Then the output will be fed into a 1st order IIR filter?

  2. Maybe 16 stages of halfband filters? (64kHz -> 0.9765625Hz) And then be fed into an IIR filter.

  3. How shall the filter be designed?

CIC = Cascaded integrator–comb
Source Link
Olli Niemitalo
  • 13.7k
  • 1
  • 35
  • 63

I asked exact the same here one year ago: One year ago question I asked this question again here, because after one year, I have learned more about DSP and am thinking ways to improve it.

Filter description

  • Filter input data rate is 64kHz

  • Filter output data rate is 0.5Hz - 2Hz

  • The filter is preferably to have bandwidth of 1mHz with very sharp transition area, since only DC is needed and the noises at 0-5Hz is large.

The answer I got

The averaging data is the best DC I can get. I bought this answer. However, it now becomes plausible to me, since a filter always have a bandwidth and frequency responses. Averaging is essentially a FIR with no superior characteristics.

Questions

  1. Shall the filter be designed in this way: 9 stages of halfband filters(64kHz -> 125Hz). Followed by three stages of CICcascaded integrator–comb (CIC) filters with R=5. Then the output will be fed into a 1st order IIR filter?

  2. Maybe 16 stages of halfband filters? (64kHz -> 0.9765625Hz) And then be fed into an IIR filter.

  3. How shall the filter be designed?

I asked exact the same here one year ago: One year ago question I asked this question again here, because after one year, I have learned more about DSP and am thinking ways to improve it.

Filter description

  • Filter input data rate is 64kHz

  • Filter output data rate is 0.5Hz - 2Hz

  • The filter is preferably to have bandwidth of 1mHz with very sharp transition area, since only DC is needed and the noises at 0-5Hz is large.

The answer I got

The averaging data is the best DC I can get. I bought this answer. However, it now becomes plausible to me, since a filter always have a bandwidth and frequency responses. Averaging is essentially a FIR with no superior characteristics.

Questions

  1. Shall the filter be designed in this way: 9 stages of halfband filters(64kHz -> 125Hz). Followed by three stages of CIC filters with R=5. Then the output will be fed into a 1st order IIR filter?

  2. Maybe 16 stages of halfband filters? (64kHz -> 0.9765625Hz) And then be fed into an IIR filter.

  3. How shall the filter be designed?

I asked exact the same here one year ago: One year ago question I asked this question again here, because after one year, I have learned more about DSP and am thinking ways to improve it.

Filter description

  • Filter input data rate is 64kHz

  • Filter output data rate is 0.5Hz - 2Hz

  • The filter is preferably to have bandwidth of 1mHz with very sharp transition area, since only DC is needed and the noises at 0-5Hz is large.

The answer I got

The averaging data is the best DC I can get. I bought this answer. However, it now becomes plausible to me, since a filter always have a bandwidth and frequency responses. Averaging is essentially a FIR with no superior characteristics.

Questions

  1. Shall the filter be designed in this way: 9 stages of halfband filters(64kHz -> 125Hz). Followed by three stages of cascaded integrator–comb (CIC) filters with R=5. Then the output will be fed into a 1st order IIR filter?

  2. Maybe 16 stages of halfband filters? (64kHz -> 0.9765625Hz) And then be fed into an IIR filter.

  3. How shall the filter be designed?

deleted 21 characters in body
Source Link

I asked exact the same here one year ago: One year ago questionOne year ago question I asked this question again here, because after one year, I have learned more about DSP and am thinking ways to improve it.

Filter description

  • Filter input data rate is 64kHz

  • Filter output data rate is 0.5Hz - 2Hz

  • The filter is preferably to have bandwidth of 1mHz with very sharp transition area, since only DC is needed and the noises at 0-5Hz is large.

The answer I got

The averaging data is the best DC I can get. I bought this answer. However, it now becomes plausible to me, since a filter always have a bandwidth and frequency responses. Averaging is essentially a FIR with no superior characteristics.

Questions

  1. Shall the filter be designed in this way: 9 stages of halfband filters(64kHz -> 125Hz). Followed by three stages of CIC filters with R=5. Then the output will be fed into a 1st order IIR filter?

  2. Maybe 16 stages of halfband filters? (64kHz -> 0.9765625Hz) And then be fed into an IIR filter.

  3. How shall the filter be designed?

I asked exact the same here one year ago: One year ago question I asked this question again here, because after one year, I have learned more about DSP and am thinking ways to improve it.

Filter description

  • Filter input data rate is 64kHz

  • Filter output data rate is 0.5Hz - 2Hz

  • The filter is preferably to have bandwidth of 1mHz with very sharp transition area, since only DC is needed and the noises at 0-5Hz is large.

The answer I got

The averaging data is the best DC I can get. I bought this answer. However, it now becomes plausible to me, since a filter always have a bandwidth and frequency responses. Averaging is essentially a FIR with no superior characteristics.

Questions

  1. Shall the filter be designed in this way: 9 stages of halfband filters(64kHz -> 125Hz). Followed by three stages of CIC filters with R=5. Then the output will be fed into a 1st order IIR filter?

  2. Maybe 16 stages of halfband filters? (64kHz -> 0.9765625Hz) And then be fed into an IIR filter.

  3. How shall the filter be designed?

I asked exact the same here one year ago: One year ago question I asked this question again here, because after one year, I have learned more about DSP and am thinking ways to improve it.

Filter description

  • Filter input data rate is 64kHz

  • Filter output data rate is 0.5Hz - 2Hz

  • The filter is preferably to have bandwidth of 1mHz with very sharp transition area, since only DC is needed and the noises at 0-5Hz is large.

The answer I got

The averaging data is the best DC I can get. I bought this answer. However, it now becomes plausible to me, since a filter always have a bandwidth and frequency responses. Averaging is essentially a FIR with no superior characteristics.

Questions

  1. Shall the filter be designed in this way: 9 stages of halfband filters(64kHz -> 125Hz). Followed by three stages of CIC filters with R=5. Then the output will be fed into a 1st order IIR filter?

  2. Maybe 16 stages of halfband filters? (64kHz -> 0.9765625Hz) And then be fed into an IIR filter.

  3. How shall the filter be designed?

Source Link
Loading