Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with stationary
Search options not deleted
user 50410
1
vote
0
answers
85
views
Why is Power spectral density of random walk noise defined despite it being non-stationary? [duplicate]
However, random walk noise is a non-stationary process, and as far as I know PSD is only defined for stationary processes. For non-stationary processes, the PSD would also be time dependent. … EDIT: I have been made aware that my question is also similar to this one: Power Spectral Density of Brownian Motion despite non-stationary …
- 63