No, the expression $$x(t)\rightarrow x(n\cdot(mT_0))$$
is an incorrect representation of sampling.
Under certain conditions, a continuous-time signal can be completely represented by and recoverable from knowledge of its values, or samples, at points equally spaced in time (uniform sampling). This can be characterized by the following expression:
$$x(t)\xrightarrow[C/D]{t=nT_s} x(nT_s)$$
where $T_s$ is your sampling period.
Here is an example to help you visualize this process:
Consider the a particular case of your function as $x(t) = 2+\cos(\pi t)$ (blue in the figure below) where $T_0$ is $2$, $\mu_0$ is $2$ and $\hat{\mu} = 1$.
Now if we replace $t\rightarrow nT_s$ and choose $T_s$ to be $1/2$ we will get the discrete function $x[n] =2+\cos(\frac{\pi}{2} n)$, in red.

As you can see the samples are found at integer multiples of your sampling period. Here we sampled 5 periods of this cosine and that generated 20 samples (21st sample in the plot is extra). The original cosine in $x(t)$ had a period of $2$ seconds and we sampled it at every $0.5$ seconds.Here, $N=20$ and $m=5$ the answer to your question if the continuous function was as I gave in my example. To generate more such examples you can check this example out in desmos.
Sidenote: If you want to discretize your CT function in such a way that you could also recover it later then you should pay attention to your choice of $T_s$. To learn more about that issue study the Shannon-Kotelnikov sampling theorem.