0
$\begingroup$

I'm currently reading a paper and I can't seem to make sense of a certain part. A link to the paper: removed

The part I don't quite get is on page 286 (after the part where they explain their filters). It starts with the sentence "Two common methods can be used ...". They explain how they calculate the interbeat intervals of a signal.

The things I do not understand:

Cubic spline interpolation is applied to the data for ensuring the existence of continuous first-order differential and second-order differential

1. Do they mean that the first & second order derivative of two sequential splines should be the same to ensure that they are smooth ?

Then:

$m$ is the number of feature points

2. Is this the $n$ in the formula ? ( really none of the symbols are explained of the formula. I doubt t is the value at a certain frame, since the values are really small, which would make it impossible to be in the defined interval.)

Subsequently then:

We consider the interval between [0.25, 2]

3. what is this interval ? With respect to which variable ?

And this sentence I can't figure out entirely.

We choose the first-order differential point in each cycle of BVP as characteristic point to demarcate the interval. The number of first-order differential points in a period of wave fluctuates narrowly than the number of usual maximum points in the presence of measuring errors.

4. How do they know anything about any cycle at this point, this is what they are trying to determine at this point ...

5. What is a first-order differential point in a cycle ?

6. Is a feature point a first-order differential point ?

I am trying to implement this (in python), based on this explanation I can't seem to figure out the details to do this.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ No, it's not accessible. Your question doesn't show a lot of research effort. You should at least describe the important aspects of the paper, that you don't understand and make your question more specific. $\endgroup$ – Deve Apr 10 '13 at 14:40
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, you are right, it was because I do not understand many aspects of this part. I listed some problems and gave a working link to the paper. $\endgroup$ – Olivier_s_j Apr 10 '13 at 14:54
1
$\begingroup$

I splitted the question into smaller bits to allow more precise answers.

  • Question 1: you seem to not understand what spline interpolation is. The quoted sentence means that you need to use an interpolation function that guarantees the continuity of 1st and 2nd order derivatives. This is the case of cubic spline and a justification for their use.
  • Question 2: yes, I guess that there is a typo here and $n$ is $m$.
  • Question 3: it is an interval of sampling rates. It is not very clear though...
  • Questions 4/5: the paper is clearly not clear or informative at this point. What the authors do is to detect a heart cycle by looking at the 1st order differential points (not defined, but that are opposed to the number of local extrema). My guess is that these points are the zero-crossing of the signal derivative (computed from the spline interpolation, cf. question 1).

As an additional note, the paper is not really well written or informative. For example, Laplacian eigenmaps are poorly exposed, and prior knowledge is required to understand it. Maybe you should pick another reference paper in order to get started in this field.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I'm starting to think the same. I first thought that first-order differential points were steep positive derivatives. But when I test this together with an interpretation on what their equation does ... I get values that are wrong. I also tested it with first-order differential points as the zero-crossing of the signal, but I also get wrong values. $\endgroup$ – Olivier_s_j Apr 11 '13 at 15:07
  • $\begingroup$ The 1st order points are used to detect periods in the sinusoidal signal, with the additional remark that the amplitude of the signal is not constant. I am pretty sure of my guess but honestly it is only backed by prior knowledge and a bit of thinking, not at all from the paper that is really confusing. $\endgroup$ – sansuiso Apr 11 '13 at 15:09
1
$\begingroup$

I can only offer a suggestion regarding Question 2, which is that .25 Hz and 2 Hz represent the reasonable bounds of the signal they're interested in.

In a related paper on measuring heart rate via video, they consider the range .75 Hz to 4 Hz of a computed frequency spectrum to find a human heart rate (.75 Hz = 45 BPM, 4 Hz = 240 BPM). Now, .25 Hz = 15 BPM and 2 Hz = 120 BPM aren't the most reasonable bounds for a human heart, so maybe they're looking for a related measure if they're focused on HRV.

What is the name of the paper?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ "Automatic Webcam-Based Human Heart Rate Measurements Using Laplacian Eigenmap" I contacted the authors and they told me there are some mistakes in the paper. But I'm pretty confident their detection of the heart rate is not working properly. $\endgroup$ – Olivier_s_j May 8 '13 at 6:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.