3
$\begingroup$

I am working based on Angelo Farinas paper: Simultaneous measurement of impulse response and distortion with a swept-sine technique.

The purpose of the work is part of a loudspeaker measurement and analysis system.

At present my "measurement" data is generated via a non-linear transducer model, so simulated to include typical electroacoustic transducer non-linearities. The simulation is time-domain based and outputs displacement, velocity and acceleration data.

The process as it stands is:

  1. Excite the transducer model with a exponential sweep defined by:

$ x(t)=\sin\left(\frac{\omega_1T}{\ln(\frac{\omega_2}{\omega_1})}(e^{\frac{t\ln(\omega_2)}{\omega_1}}-1)\right) $

  1. Create an inverse filter

(which gives a delayed Dirac delta function when convolved with the input function $x(t)\circledast f(t)\rightarrow\delta(t)$):

$ f(t) = \frac{x_\text{inv}(t)}{e^{\frac{t\cdot \ln(\frac{\omega_2}{\omega_1})}{T}}} $

  1. Convolve the transducer model output signal $y(t)$ with the inverse filter to retreive the systems impulse response $h(t)$:

$ h(t)=y(t)\circledast f(t) $

System impulse response <span class=$h(t)$" />

  1. Isolate and plot the FFT of each impulse in the system impulse response (right to left) in order of harmonics:

enter image description here

My main questions are, am I on the right track with this? Are there alternative methods I have missed? What improvements I can make?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

You are doing in the right way. There are some additional points to improve the result.

  1. In this JAES paper the authors present a new type of swept-sine named synchronized swept-sine, which outperforms the exponential swept-sine in Farinas's paper when the phase response of harmonics is important for you.

  2. It can be seen that the measured impulse responses have significant "pre-ringing" artifact in your figure. This is maybe caused by the frequency range of your swept-sine. You should ensure the frequency of swept-sine cover the whole frequency band which goes from nearly 0 and up to Nyquist, otherwise the spectrum of swept-sine looks like a rectangular window and its time-domain impulse response will be a sinc function rather than a delta function.

  3. However, we can't set $\omega_1=0$, and in some cases low frequency can cause pre-ringing as well. In this case you may use frequency-domain deconvolution with proper regularization.

In this AES convention paper Farinas concludes some problems of this method and also the solutions to solve them. You may have a look at it.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the response, I will take a look at the papers you have recomended and try to tackle the pre-ring you have pointed out. I will update the question with improvements I've made as I go forward. Cheers. $\endgroup$
    – Jammus
    Apr 8 at 10:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ah I have read some of Novak's other papers for my undergraduate =) $\endgroup$
    – Jammus
    Apr 8 at 11:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.