Exponential sweep sine (ESS) is a good excitation signal to measure the impulse response of an acoustic system, such as loudspeaker - room - microphone system. An ESS has the form of

$$ x(t) = \sin\Big[\frac{2\pi f_1 T}{R} (e^{tR/T} - 1) \Big] $$ where $t$ is the time variable in second, $T$ is the duration of the sine sweep, $f_1$ and $f_2$ are the start and final frequency in Hz, respectively, and $R=\ln(f_2/f_1)$ is the exponential sweep rate.

The signal has a constant magnitude over time, and the magnitude spectrum shows a decay, of 6 dB per octave to be precise. This magnitude decay must be compensated when the impulse response is calculated with the deconvolution procedure.

In this question Matt states that ESS doesn't have a close form Fourier transform. So my question is that is it possible to prove this 6 dB per octave decay. In this case we only need the magnitude of the Fourier transform of ESS.

Related question: Calculating the inverse filter for the (exponential) sine sweep Method


1 Answer 1


This JAES paper gives a close form of the Fourier transform of the synchronized swept-sine (SSS) signal which has the same form as the ESS

$$ x(t) = \sin \big\{2\pi f_1L \big[\exp(t/L) -1 \big]\big\} $$ where $$ L = \frac{1}{f_1} \mathrm{round}\left[\frac{\hat{T}f_1}{\ln(f_2/f_1)}\right] $$ and $\hat{T}$ is the approximate time length of $x(t)$.

The authors derive the Fourier transform of the analytic signal of the SSS: $$ z(t) = \exp\Big\{j2\pi f_1L \big[\exp(t/L) -1\big]\Big\} $$ and $$ Z(f) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty z(t) e^{-j2\pi ft} dt $$

After a long derivation, we have the final result

$$ Z(f) = \exp\left[ j2\pi fL\left( 1-\ln\frac{f}{f_1} \right) \right] \times \sqrt{\frac{L}{f}} \exp(j\frac{\pi}{4}) $$

The magnitude of $Z(f)$ is inversely proportional to $\sqrt{f}$, i. e. the Fourier spectrum falls down by 3 dB/octave, and the power spectrum decreases by 6 dB/octave.

  • $\begingroup$ BTW, compared with ESS, SSS is a better way to measure the phase of a nonlinear system. $\endgroup$
    – ZR Han
    Jan 7 at 5:03
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ this is really cool. the paper done completely in continuous-time mathematics. until the Appendix A.2, where there is code, all of the paper was continuous math. no samples. no $x[n]$. $$ $$ wow. $\endgroup$ Jan 7 at 8:32
  • $\begingroup$ @robertbristow-johnson yeah, math is beautiful! $\endgroup$
    – ZR Han
    Jan 7 at 10:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.