0
$\begingroup$

I want to make sure if I got this right, the following statement:

if the operator enters a unity sloped linearly increasing input then the output must eventually track the input and be at most 0.1 cm away.

does it imply that the operator signals a function $x(t)=at+b$ for $a=1$ as an input?

Short summary: This is based on a project of designing a controller that allows the available robots to perform some packaging assessments. The operator here should control the arm of the robot.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Please provide a source for this statement. The wording is somewhat unusual and without context it's hard to tell what this is about. $\endgroup$
    – Hilmar
    Nov 12 '21 at 18:21
  • $\begingroup$ Alright I will edit the question in a moment @Hilmar $\endgroup$
    – SPARSE
    Nov 12 '21 at 18:21
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, this still very confusing. "unity slope" implies that the input and the output have the same units. It can't be "position as a function of time" since the slope for this would have to be a velocity and cannot be unitless. So it could be either time as a function of time or position as a function of position, which honestly doesn't make much sense to me. $\endgroup$
    – Hilmar
    Nov 13 '21 at 13:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.