-1
$\begingroup$

Full question

For this question the guide says to use $Y(e^{j\omega}) = H(e^{j\omega}) X(e^{j\omega})$. I have been able to find the discrete time Fourier transform of the impulse function as $$H(e^{j\omega}) = \frac{1}{1-\frac12 e^{-j\omega}}$$ Finding the same for the impulse function is what I do not understand.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm pretty sure that the $n$ in the denominator of the definition of $x[n]$ is a typo or misinterpretation. I guess it's meant to be a $4$ or something similar. Whatever it is, the term in parentheses is very likely supposed to be a constant. $\endgroup$
    – Matt L.
    May 8, 2021 at 10:46
  • $\begingroup$ You're right, the lecturer for the course commented after the submission that the denominator n was supposed to be 4. $\endgroup$
    – Eiv
    Jun 10, 2021 at 20:31
  • $\begingroup$ 1: are you sure you're supposed to use the Fourier transform here? 2: What is the definition of $\delta[n]$ (i.e., the impulse)? What happens if you just plug that into the definition of the Fourier transform (or whatever tool you ought to be using)? $\endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    Oct 5, 2021 at 15:04

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

Note that the given definition of $x[n]$ is undefined for $n=0$. But even if you changed it by replacing the unit step $u[n]$ by the shifted step $u[n-1]$ to exclude the value $n=0$, then the problem would still be very hard to solve. So it's more than likely that the correct definition of $x[n]$ has no $n$ in the denominator, and the current form is just a consequence of a typo or of a misinterpretation.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.