I am trying to implement a mathematical model for vibrational damping described in this article.

They provide an equation for damping force ($F$) as a function of:

  • a spring constant ($k$)
  • a damping coefficient ($η$)
  • displacement of the point being damped ($x$)
  • velocity of that point ($\dot{x}$)
  • mean displacement and velocity for the point ($x_m$ and $\dot{x}_m$)

I understand the basic principle of the force equation. However, my math is not very advanced, and I don't understand how they calculate the mean displacement and velocity ($x_m$ and $\dot{x}_m$), given by the equation for $z_m$.

The relevant excerpt is as follows:

enter image description here

The equation for $z_m$ (where $z = x$, $z= \dot{x}$) is what I don't understand. I presume $n$ here is a time constant that allows a relative weighting for older or newer values. Is that correct?

What does the expression $t^{n+1}$ represent? Do they mean time raised to exponent of $(n+1)$? Or something else like time at sample $(n+1)$?

What about the integral? Do they mean a Laplace $s$? What do I do with this in a stepwise function? They explain that this ought to be solved using a stepwise iterative approach which is perfect because I am using stepwise finite difference modeling for the system I want to add this to.

In a finite difference model where $Δt$ is the time step per time sample, $n$ is a given coefficient for mean weighting, and where you have the displacement $x$/$x_m$ and velocity $\dot{x}$/$\dot{x}_m$ at the prior time step, in plain English or simple demonstrative code or line by line math, what would be an iterative solution they are suggesting for $z_m$ (ie. the current $x_m$ or $\dot{x}_m$)?

Thanks for any help. It is very much appreciated.


The variable of the weighted mean value zm would convey a more expressive power if denoted as zmean. The RHS integral in formula (14) of your reference is a "g(x)-weighted average of f(x) on the interval [0, t]", see http://www.sosmath.com/calculus/integ/integ04/integ04.html. In formula (14), f(s) is z2(s) and g(s) = sn. The integral in (14) is not a Laplace transform, but the extended g(x)-weighted mean value, and s is not a dual variable of the Laplace transform, but a dummy variable of integration.

A variable n in (14) is not an index but the exponent of the power function g(s) = sn, and t is also not indexed, but raised to a power n+1. From the fragment you presented in your question, and if they indeed use Newark's method, it does not follow that the authors seek an iterative solution for zm; rather, they use the weighted means as per formula (14) to find the solution for x, x_dotted.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.