enter image description here

I tried to calculate the unilateral Z transform of x[n-2], is it right?

  • $\begingroup$ Your last X(z) should be unilateral also. $\endgroup$
    – Juancho
    Apr 28 '20 at 22:39
  • $\begingroup$ @Juancho so you'r basically saying Unilateral Z transform of something is equal to ...something...plus(U z transform of itself)? $\endgroup$ Apr 29 '20 at 0:05

There is nothing wrong with your calculation. However, by definition, $x[n]=0$ for $n<0$, because otherwise we couldn't have used the unilateral $\mathcal{Z}$-transform in the first place. So you get

$$\mathcal{Z}\big\{x[n-k]\big\}=x^{-k}X(z),\quad k> 0\tag{1}$$

Eq. $(1)$ is valid for the unilateral as well as for the bilateral $\mathcal{Z}$-transform.

Things are different for a time advance. The unilateral $\mathcal{Z}$-transform of $x[n+k]$, $k>0$, is

$$\begin{align}\mathcal{Z}\big\{x[n+k]\big\}&=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}x[n+k]z^{-n}\\&=\sum_{n=k}^{\infty}x[n]z^{-(n-k)}\\&=z^k\left(X(z)-\sum_{n=0}^{k-1}x[n]z^{-n}\right),\quad k>0\tag{2}\end{align}$$

For the bilateral $\mathcal{Z}$-transform we simply have



Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.