0
$\begingroup$

I am studying control systems, and I am studying the lead and lag compensator.

I have seen than if I use a lead compensatpr in the following way:

consider a closed loop transfer function:

$T(s)=\frac{s+2}{(s+1)(s+8)}$

and I design a lead compensator as:

$lead(s) = \frac{3s+1}{0.1s+1}$

and I use it as a precompensator, so the lead compensator is outside the loop:

$lead(s)\cdot T(s)$

and plot the frequency response, I see that I have a frequency respose I have that there is a reasonance peak, which increases as I decrease the frequency at which the zero is present:

enter image description here

in this case, the red line is a lead compensator defined as:

$\frac{3s+1}{0.1s+1}$

and the green line is the system in which I have used the following compensator:

$\frac{6s+1}{0.1s+1}$

can somebody explain to me why?

| improve this question | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hint : Plot the frequency of both compensators. Which one has the highest gain ? $\endgroup$ – Ben Feb 24 at 20:24
1
$\begingroup$

The first compensator $\frac{3s+1}{0.1s + 1}$ has a high-frequency gain of 30.

The second compensator $\frac{6s+1}{0.1s + 1}$ has a high-frequency gain of 60.

The difference is 6.02 dB, it looks pretty close to the difference between the green and red line.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for answering. I would like to ask if there is a reason of why this happen, or it is just a computational issue? $\endgroup$ – J.D. Feb 24 at 22:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Do you know how to compute a transfer function gain at infinite frequency? It's basically L'Hospital rule $\endgroup$ – Ben Feb 24 at 22:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.