This question already has an answer here:

As far as I understand Fourier Transforms are for non-periodic signals and Fourier Series for periodic signals.

So why is it we can take the Fourier Transform of a cosine when it is a periodic function, assuming the above paragraph is correct?


marked as duplicate by Matt L., lennon310, MBaz, Stanley Pawlukiewicz, Peter K. Oct 2 at 15:12

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • $\begingroup$ Note that nothing prevents you from finding the Fourier Series of a non-periodic signal in the interval $T$. The series will converge in $T$. Likewise, as long as the integrals make sense, you can the FT of any signal you want. I recall there's a nice explanation in Paul Nahin's "The Science of Radio" if you can get ahold of it. $\endgroup$ – MBaz Sep 18 at 2:06

Indeed there are two things you have to know.

First, it can be shown that the continuous-time Fourier transform can be obtained from the continuous-time Fourier series by letting the period $T$ go to infinity.

Second, formally speaking the Fourier transform integral for periodic signals do not converge, hence do not exist. The solution is a generalisation of the Fourier transform by the use of Dirac impulse functions.

The result is an interpretation that the Fourier transform of periodic functions is a sum of scaled Dirac impulses at the Fourier harmonic frequencies, and the scale being the corresponding Fourier series coefficients.


Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.