# Why does downsampling stretch a signals frequency response and upsampling shrink and create images of a signals frequency response?

I am learning some basic DSP and I have a pretty good intuition as to why sampling creates spectral images of the frequency response at intervals of the sampling frequency (convolution with pulse train).

I am reading about sample rate conversions (downsampling/decimation and upsampling/interpolation) and I can't seem to get intuition as to why downsampling/decimation stretches the frequency response by M (the downsample factor) or why upsampling/interpolation compresses it by I (the upsample factor) and creates more images of the originally sampled datas frequency response

• ain't it the other way around? Jul 2 '19 at 2:34
• i dont think so? These are images from the book i'm reading: imgur.com/a/7YiFP63 Jul 2 '19 at 2:36
• i always think of "downsampling" as meaning reducing the sample rate (meaning that fewer samples represent the same stretch of signal) and "upsampling" as increasing the sample rate (meaning more samples reprenting the same stretch of signal). aliasing can happen when information is lost or destroyed. redundancy is the opposite of that. Jul 2 '19 at 2:39
• your definitions seem to align with what i'm reading. But the book i'm reading clearly talks about down sampling as stretching the frequency response and upsampling shrinking and creating images. If you're interested i'm referencing section 2.2.5 of this free text analog.com/media/en/training-seminars/design-handbooks/… Jul 2 '19 at 2:41
• do you mean fig. 2-13 (b)? that spectrum of the intermediate signal is what happens when there is zero-stuffing done in the up-sampling. low-pass filtering is needed to remove the repeated images. Jul 2 '19 at 2:43