0
$\begingroup$

To find the transfer function of a channel we say that it is $$ H(s) = \frac{y(s)}{x(s)}|x(s)=0 for <0 $$ Why we do not define it like $$ h(t) = \frac{y(t)}{x(t)} $$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ "Why do we not define it like $$h(t) = \frac{y(t)}{x(t)}?$$ Because $x(t)$ might have value $0$ for some choices of $t$ (think of sinusoidal signals that take on value $0$ frequently) and besides, the $h(t)$ as you would like to define it is pretty meaningless: the output $y(t)$ is not the input $x(t)$ multiplied by some $h(t)$. $\endgroup$ – Dilip Sarwate Apr 22 at 14:21
2
$\begingroup$

We do not define it in that manner. Note the difference between the time and Laplace domains.

Generally, we characterize a system by the response produced when the system is excited by an impulse response $\delta(t)$. Given the output $y(t)$ for such signal we ask which function $h(t)$ did we convolve with the $\delta(t)$ to produce it. Formulation: $$\delta(t)*h(t)=y(t)$$

Here $*$ represent convolution and not a product. When we find $h(t)$ we can produce the output for any other input $x(t)$ by means of convolution: $$x(t)*h(t)=y(t)$$

If we transform into the Laplace domain, a convolution is translated into multiplication:

$$\mathcal{F}\{x(t)*h(t)\}=\mathcal{F}\{y(t)\}$$ $$\mathcal{F}\{x(t)\}\cdot \mathcal{F}\{h(t)\}=\mathcal{F}\{y(t)\}$$ $$X(s)\cdot H(s)=Y(s)$$ $$H(s)=\frac{Y(s)}{X(s)}$$

It is a convention that the capital letters represent the transformed signals. Also, $t$ has changed into $s$ because we are now in the Laplace domain. Since the convolution transformed into a product we may now divide both sides by $X(s)$. We could not do this on the time domain because there we had a convolution operator and not a product.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ If this is the reason then can we write h(t) = y(t) * (1/x(t)) $\endgroup$ – Avinash Baldi Apr 22 at 13:21
  • $\begingroup$ No, we cannot! This is not a legal operation with convolution. You should take a pick in the Wikipedia entry for convolution to get a sense of it. $\endgroup$ – havakok Apr 22 at 13:27
  • $\begingroup$ I'm saying that if H(s) = Y(s)/X(s) then this can be written in the form H(s)=Y(s).1/(X(s))..i.e. in multiplication in s-domain and multiplication in s-domain is a convolution in time domain. $\endgroup$ – Avinash Baldi Apr 24 at 2:10
  • $\begingroup$ Multiplication in the Laplace domain is truly a convolution in the time domain. However, the inverse transformation $\mathcal{F}^{-1}\left\{\frac{1}{X(s)}\right\}\neq\frac{1}{x(t)}$. $\endgroup$ – havakok Apr 24 at 7:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.