0
$\begingroup$

Recently I came across a reputed music-tech teacher who said audio interface manufacturers use A-weighted measurements to show dynamic range in their specs so that they look better on spec sheets and to hide noise in some frequencies. He also said the A-weighted measurements are not used to measure audio interfaces and advised against buying any audio interface that has A-weighted measurements in specifications. Then I was looking at some really high end audio interfaces and noticed they're also displaying their specs in A-weighted measurements.

So what's the real deal about this? Is it fair to say an audio interface is bad just because A-weighted measurements are used in specs?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Most audio interface devices are built for the commercial electronics industry which produces devices to be used by people to listen to music, radio, TV etc; for multimedia reproduction purposes.

Therefore the commercial electronics standardisation organisations, suggest or enforce the use of a number of frequency weighting filters (A,B,C etc.) for getting more relevant results for the technical specs involved, considering that human beings will be the final consumer of the audio end result. It's not applied for getting an illusive improvement of the numbers (mostly SNR), but for providing an acceptable performance at the lowest cost.

If your purpose of audio (acoustical) interaction is some engineering or scientific measurement and computations, then look for the unfiltered (bare) specs if available. You may ask manufacturers to provide you those numbers, if possible. But most would restrain from disclosing that information due to confidential reasons...

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.