2
$\begingroup$

This is a slide from my lecture notes: enter image description here

My professor used the following words " We denote digital frequencies with capital letters and analogue frequencies with lower case letters"

The problem I have is $$\Omega=\omega T_s$$

Wherever I am looking it is actually the other way round i.e.

$$\omega = \Omega T_S$$

For example here

Is my proffesor wrong?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I think it can be however you want to define it; as long as it is clearly defined it is not wrong. $\endgroup$ – Dan Boschen Jan 13 at 20:09
3
$\begingroup$

Again there is no wrong or right here. In the Alan Oppenheim's Discrete-Time Signal Processing book, the notation is as follows:

  • when there are only continuous-time signals we use $\omega$ for radians per second frequency.
  • when there are only discrete-time signals we use $\omega$ for radians per sample frequency
  • when both types of signals are present, (as in sampling), we use $\Omega$ for the continuous-time radians per second frequency, and $\omega$ for the discrete-time radians per sample frequency.

Furthermore the relationship between the two frequencies because of sampling normalization is:

$$ \Omega = \frac{\omega}{T_s} $$

or equivalently

$$ \omega = \Omega ~ T_s $$

However, your instructor seems to prefer the opposite notation for frequencies. That's why most literature seems to be reciprocal of your instructor's.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.