I am new to DSP, and I'm self studying. Could someone please explain to me what do we mean by trivial and non-trivial zeros?

  • $\begingroup$ Could you give a reference that uses these terms? $\endgroup$ – Matt L. Nov 22 '18 at 11:49

I wasn't familiar with that term in the context of signal processing. (Instead, I've seen the term being used in the context of the Riemann zeta function.) But I've found a document and this book where the term is used in a DSP context. The (obvious) definition is that trivial poles and zeros are the ones at the origin $z=0$ and at infinity $|z|=\infty$. They're called trivial because they don't affect the magnitude of the corresponding frequency response. Multiplying a given $\mathcal{Z}$-transform with $z$ (i.e. adding a pole at infinity and a zero at the origin) just advances the corresponding sequence by one sample, and multiplying by $z^{-1}$ (i.e., adding a pole at the origin and a zero at infinity) delays the corresponding sequence by one sample.

As an example, note that a causal FIR filter has as many poles as zeros, but all of them are at the origin $z=0$, i.e., they can't be used to shape the magnitude response. The same is true for an all-pole filter: all its zeros are at the origin, so they don't help to create a stop band (which would be one possible function of non-trivial zeros).

I think it's important to point out that the term trivial zero (or pole) is not a standard term used in DSP - as far as I know - but it appears to be an idiosyncratic use of a few authors.

  • $\begingroup$ the typical way in the literature to refer to something idiosyncratic , “so called trivial zeros” $\endgroup$ – Stanley Pawlukiewicz Nov 22 '18 at 15:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.