I am given the following system and I am checking the additive property:

$$y(t)=x(e^t)$$

where $y(t)$ is the output and $x(t)$ is the input given to the system.

Now this is what I did so far:

\begin{align} x_1(t)&\rightarrow \text{system} \rightarrow& y_1(t)=&x_1(e^t)\\ x_2(t)&\rightarrow \text{system} \rightarrow& y_2(t)=&x_2(e^t)\\ \end{align}

$$y_1(t) + y_2(t) = x_1(e^t) + x_2(e^t)$$ How will system respond to this input?

$$x_1(t) + x_2(t)\rightarrow system \rightarrow = $$

What I think is that this is what will happen:

$$x_1(t) + x_2(t)\rightarrow system \rightarrow = x_1(e^t)+x_2(e^t)$$

Am I right?

closed as unclear what you're asking by Stanley Pawlukiewicz, lennon310, Marcus Müller, Matt L., A_A Oct 14 at 9:52

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • What do $y$ and $x$ represent in the first equation you wrote ($y(t)=x(e^t)$)? – Tendero Oct 10 at 13:24
  • I think you are right. A system is additive if $S\{ x_1(t) + x_2(t) \} = S\{ x_1(t) \} + S\{ x_2(t) \}$, where $S\{ \cdot \}$ is the system. – Maxtron Oct 10 at 19:21
  • $y(t)=x(t)$ describes a perfect system where signals enter and leave undistorted. Do you think you could clarify the question a little bit? – A_A Oct 14 at 9:52

Additivity requires a little more than direct addition of some $x_1$ and $x_2$. It should involve any linear combination of $x_1$ and $x_2$, $a_1 x_1 + a_2 x_2$ where $a_1$ and $a_2$ are "kind of scalars". This could make us dive into complicated stuff, like in Does scaling property imply superposition?

In you case, however, linearity works, because you are touching the "time base" ($t$ vs. $e^t$) without touching the amplitudes accordingly:

$$\mathcal{S}(a_1 x_1(t) + a_2 x_2(t)) = a_1 x_1(e^t) + a_2 x_2(e^t) = \mathcal{S}(a_1 x_1(t)) + \mathcal{S}(a_2 x_2(t)) $$

  • Afaik it sufficies for $a_1$ and $a_2$ to be complex? What other complications did you imply? (or did you?) I read from the other link that you mention about irrational and rational number fields... – Fat32 Oct 10 at 22:11
  • If, if inputs ans outputs are real or complex. In some rare cases, they belong to another structure (like values in a finite field) – Laurent Duval Oct 14 at 9:25

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.