Is there any open and free data-set for digital ISI channels? I want to have a variety of ISI channels' taps, such as $h[k]$ here. Especially looking for BPSK channels.
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
4
-
1$\begingroup$ Note that a channel model will work for any modulation -- how the signal was modulated (BPSK or otherwise) is usually irrelevant. $\endgroup$– MBazSep 25, 2018 at 15:42
-
$\begingroup$ @MBaz That's not 100% correct, if I use BPSK modulation I assume I don't have 'Q' channel, only 'I' so the taps should be non-complex. $\endgroup$– CodevanSep 25, 2018 at 15:46
-
1$\begingroup$ Yeah, but the point is, in a wireless channel some of the energy in the 'I' channel will spill to the 'Q' channel, so you really need both in the receiver. The taps should be complex even if you don't transmit in quadrature. $\endgroup$– MBazSep 25, 2018 at 16:25
-
1$\begingroup$ Exactly as MBaz has stated, consider in all typical applications for BPSK there will be offsets between the transmitter and receiver carriers (hence the need for carrier recovery) so while in the channel the transmit signal will be rotating (through I and Q equally) relative to the receiver at the carrier offset. $\endgroup$– Dan BoschenSep 25, 2018 at 16:49
Add a comment
|
1 Answer
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
Things like the good ole' GSM standard specify power delay profiles and a phase variation model. So, there you go, reference model delivered in the shape of a standard.
Other than that, if you're just looking for any ISI-inducing (i.e. frequency-selective) channel, why not use your favourite DSP framework to come up with a random FIR filter?
Also, a lot of frameworks do come with their own channel simulations; GNU Radio for example brings multiple channel models of varying realism in its gr-channel module.
I often find that students overestimate the complexity of actually measuring a channel impulse response to use it in their own channel simulations. Just send a PN, receive it at the same time, and use a correlation to find the impulse response; if your receiver and transmitter exhibit a frequency offset, you might need to try a couple of frequency shifts and use the one that gives the highest correlation coefficients.
answered Sep 25, 2018 at 19:07