# Question about Fourier descriptor and the physical meaning of the coefficients

I would have some questions about the Fourier descriptor and the physical interpretation of the individual coefficients. I'm rather new to this concept, so I would be looking for a simple answer.

To start with I have a curve in xy [mm] coordinates (188x2 points). To calculate the descriptor I use the function found in R.C. Gonzales 'Digital Image Processing using Matlab' (p. 629). From that I get a vector with the descriptors An (188x1). As far as I understand the concept of the descriptor I can 'filter' out the high frequencies by reconstructing the shape again with only a handful of descriptors.

Here are my questions now:

1. I read that, the DC component A0 is the position of my shape in the image and its the mean values of the x,y coordinates. I understand that, I could calculate the position directly form my x,y coordinates, but I was wondering where this DC component is in the descriptor vector, since its a even number of values. Is it the term with the highest value?

2. Which brings me to my second question. If I recalculate the shape with only 2 descriptors I obtain a circle around the mean position with a certain radius. Is the radius then the second highest value?

3. Last question. Im mainly interested in the ellipses that is created with recalculating the shape with 4 factors. But I would also like to understand the whole concept correctly. I read that the A-1 and A1 coefficients represent the major (d) and minor (e) axis of this ellipses. And that with d = 2(|A-1| + |A1|) and e = 2(|A-1| - |A1|) the axis can be calculated in a length unit. Do I have to scale these values somehow? Because if I pick the third and fourth highest values, the result is not what I expect.

I hope someone can help me better understand this. Thank you in advance.

This question overlaps, to an extent, with this one. The best way to understand the Fourier Descriptors is through a basic understanding of the Discrete Fourier Transform.

The "curve" is basically a complex signal at the input of the DFT that is decomposed to a sum of wavy ellipsoid rings of increasing frequency.

Another convenient way to think about this is that what we usually see as "amplitude vs time" has now become "radius vs angle". Amplitude of a quantity versus time is how this quantity increases and decreases over time. In the radius vs angle way of thinking, you map the amplitude to the radius of an ellipsoid and the angle to a point on its circumference. Just as you read a diagram left to right, you "read" a curve beginning at some point and proceeding to the next either clockwise or counter clockwise.

...where this DC component is in the descriptor vector, since its a even number of values. Is it the term with the highest value?

The DC component is the first "bin" of the DFT. Given some signal $v[n]$, its DFT is $V = \mathcal{F}(v)$. But $V$ is usually indexed by $k$, as in $V[k]$. The $k^{th}$ value of $V$ is called a "bin". $V[0]$ is what is known as the DC component and it is basically a constant value. Because of the way the DFT is evaluated, the $V[0]$ is basically $\frac{1}{N}\sum_{v \in V} v$ and because $v$ is complex, the result can be complex too. But since you have encoded your $x,y$ curve as a complex signal of $v[n] = x[n] + j y[n]$, that $V[0]$ is basically representing the centroid of the curve.

If I recalculate the shape with only 2 descriptors I obtain a circle around the mean position with a certain radius. Is the radius then the second highest value?

It is difficult to know what your reconstruction looks like without a specific example. The first component will be an ellipsoid which represents the mean radius through all points. If you keep adding components, all that you do is adding "squiggliness" to the average ellipsoid until a point where that original ellipsoid has become as squiggly as the curve.

Here is an excellent example:

From this paper.

Every value of $V$ is how quickly the radius varies versus the angle argument around the curve. So every value of $V$ is a "radius".

I'm mainly interested in the ellipses that is created with recalculating the shape with 4 factors. But I would also like to understand the whole concept correctly. I read that the $A_{-1}$ and $A_1$ coefficients represent the major and minor axis of this ellipses. And that with $d = 2(|A_{-1}| + |A_{1}|)$ and $e = 2(|A_{-1}| - |A_1|)$ the axis can be calculated in a length unit. Do I have to scale these values somehow? Because if I pick the third and fourth highest values, the result is not what I expect.

What you are probably experiencing there is the scaling factor of the DFT.

I do not have Gonzalez' book handy right now but I will check and amend this part if it refers to something else, especially with respect to the way $A$ is indexed here.

In general there is a $\frac{1}{N}$ scaling factor for the DFT which is usually applied in the inverse transform (see for example here and here. So, the forward transform evaluates sums directly and this is why you end up with $V$s that are very high compared to the original signal. If you want to use those frequency coefficients directly, you have to divide them by $\frac{1}{N}$.

But, apart from the DC component, the rest of the ellipsoids do not have a "radius".

What are you trying to measure?

Hope this helps

• Thanks for the detailed answer. Im more or less trying to copy what was done in this paper: sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780444818119500408 . They are measuring the shadow images for bubbles and determening the ellipsoids short ans long half axis (or rather the oszilaltion in that radius over time) with this method. And it is stated that the |A-1| and |A1| represent those axsis. – Katl Sep 10 '18 at 8:05
• Hi, I am afraid that I do not have access to that paper but it solves the "mystery" of the $A$s because Gonzalez' book does not mention any $A$ in the book. Do you think you could link a screenshot of that passage or the paper from another source (e.g. follow up work) where I could see what it is that they do? I think that the "problem" is not so much the ordering of the FDs but the scaling of the transform. If you found the question useful you can upvote or accept it via the controls on the left which will stop it from circulating on the board as unanswered too. – A_A Sep 10 '18 at 15:33