From my studying difference equations and transfer functions, I understand that when a complex exponential input $x[n]=z_1^n$ is applied to an LTI system with transfer function $H(z)$, determining the output involves evaluating the transfer function at $z=z_1$, i.e. $H(z_1)$ which is a complex quantity that simply scales the input signal to produce the output. The textbook I have uses a sinusoid input to show the effect (the transfer function causes a magnitude and phase change to the input).

The answers to this question I asked a while ago made the point of recognizing the difference between $a^n$ and $a^n \cdot u[n]$. All of that was in the context of two sided signals and the bilateral z-transform.

In something I found online, in the context of causal signals and the unilateral z-transform, there was a question posed: "if $x[n]=(1/2)^n \cdot u[n] \to y[n]=\delta [n-2],$ what is the output for $x[n]=cos(\frac{\pi}{3}n)?$", where the author determined the output by evaluating $H(z)$ determined from the first relationship at $z=e^{jn \pi /3}$. Since this is a 'causal' context, isn't that cosine really $x[n]=cos(n\frac{\pi}{3}) \cdot u[n]$ and hence requires taking the z-transform of the input?

When can you just evaluate $H(z)$ at the value of interest, and when do you have to take the (unilateral) z-transform of the input?


For a discrete-time LTI system with transfer function $H(z)$, the response to $x[n]=z_1^n$ equals $y[n]=H(z_1)z_1^n$ if $z_1$ is inside the region of convergence of $H(z)$. This relationship holds whether or not the system is causal or stable.

From this relationship it follows that if the system is real-valued and stable, i.e., if its impulse response is real-valued and if $H(e^{j\omega})=|H(e^{j\omega})|e^{j\phi(\omega)}$ exists, the response to a sinusoidal input $x[n]=\cos(n\omega_0)$ is given by $y[n]=|H(e^{j\omega_0})|\cos[n\omega_0+\phi(\omega_0)]$.

I think your confusion comes from assuming something you call a "causal context". It doesn't matter if a system is causal or not for above relationships to hold. You can apply a sinusoidal input signal to a causal system, and as long as the system is real-valued and stable, the output will be given by the relationship mentioned above. If the input is a sinusoid switched on at a finite $n=n_0$, the system's response can be computed by solving the convolution sum or, equivalently, by using the $\mathcal{Z}$-transform.

  • $\begingroup$ So, where I am using the unilateral z-transform, a sinusoid or even an complex exponential signal such as $a^n$ is not considered switched on at n=0? In which case, only if I had a signal where the signal is turned on at $n=n_0$ where $n_0 >0$ would I use the z-transform of the input to determine the output. Is this correct? $\endgroup$ – Westerley Aug 13 '18 at 4:31
  • $\begingroup$ @Westerley: If you have a signal $z_1^n$ or $\cos(\omega_0n)$ then there's usually no restriction on the values of $n$. Otherwise one needs to state $n\ge 0$, or multiply the sequence with the unit step sequence $u[n]$. If the input is switched on (by specifically mentioning $n\ge 0$ or multiplication with $u[n]$) then you can use the (unilateral) Z-transform. You can always use convolution, no matter if the signal extends over all possible values of $n$ or just the non-negative values. $\endgroup$ – Matt L. Aug 13 '18 at 8:24
  • $\begingroup$ I think this is what confuses me: if I'm using the unilateral z-Transform, what's the difference betwen $ z_1^n $ and $ z_1^n \cdot u[n] $? Aren't they going to be the same? If I've determined a transfer function by taking the unilateral z-Transform of the impulse function and then apply an exponential signal, what will the difference between the exponential signal with and without the $u[n]$? $\endgroup$ – Westerley Aug 17 '18 at 4:51
  • $\begingroup$ More specifically, if I'm told that $x[n]=(1/2)^n \to y[n]$, I can determine the transfer function as $Y(z)/X(z)$, using the unilateral z-Transform to do so. But in that case, since I'm ignoring signal for $n<0$, what's the difference between $(1/2)^n$ and $(1/2)^n\cdot u[n]$? The 'switched on' signal and the eigenfunction signal look identical, no? $\endgroup$ – Westerley Aug 17 '18 at 5:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.