0
$\begingroup$

At this USGS very good site about rms noise in sensors, a phrase regarding third octave bands (the original topic) appeared.

The figure displays the minimum vertical seismic noise directly as rms amplitudes in a bandwidth of one-sixth decade. By coincidence, these amplitudes may also be interpreted as average peak amplitudes in a bandwidth of one-third octave (a standard bandwidth in acoustics)

One sixth decade factor is $10^{1/6}=1.467799$; the 10th factor $10/6=1.666666$, and one third octave factor $2^{1/3}=1.259921$, none of them being comparable.

It happens actually to be comparable with one tenth decade factor $10^{1/10}=1.258925$.

Note the rms and peak distictions... Why the author state as coincident both log factors?

enter image description here

In addition, the same paragraph continues with:

An example: the minimum vertical ground noise between the periods of 10 and 20 sec is at -180 dB relative to ${\rm 1 m/s^2}$, thus ${\rm 10^{-180/20}\;m/s^2 = 1\;nm/s^2}$ average peak in one-third octave.

Which is ok, but then:

Since the bandwidth considered is a full octave, the total average peak amplitude in this band is ${\rm\sqrt{3}\;nm/s^2}$.

In here i honestly dont know why a $\sqrt 3$ factor appeared...

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

I think they made a mistake. $2^{1/3} \approx 1.259921$ is not close enough to $10^{1/6} \approx 1.467799$ to say that there is any coincidence. Even the half-octave factor $2^{1/2} \approx 1.414214$ is closer.

$\endgroup$
7
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think the OP is trying to compare $2^{1/3}=1.259921$ and $10^{1/10}=1.258925$ which are more nearly comparable: $$\left(2^{1/3}\right)^{10} = \left(2^{10}\right)^{1/3} \approx \left(10^3\right)^{1/3} = 10\implies 2^{1/3} \approx 10^{1/10}$$ $\endgroup$ – Dilip Sarwate Apr 10 '18 at 15:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DilipSarwate the source does not mention $10^{1/10}.$ $\endgroup$ – Olli Niemitalo Apr 10 '18 at 16:25
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You are right; it is the OP who observed the similarity of the two numbers and the source is incorrect, as you already told her. $\endgroup$ – Dilip Sarwate Apr 10 '18 at 17:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That factor comes from that if each third of the octave of interest have 1 nm/s² "average peak", which is some sort of an amplitude quantity (similar to RMS), then they sum as $\sqrt{1 + 1 + 1}$ nm/s² average peak if the noises in the three bands are independent. $\endgroup$ – Olli Niemitalo Apr 10 '18 at 21:47
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @robertbristow-johnson That's right. The underlying connection can be described by that each $2^{10} = 10^a$ and $2^{1/a} = 10^{1/10}$ solve as $a = \frac{10\ln(2)}{\ln(10)} \approx 3.010299956 \approx 3.$ $\endgroup$ – Olli Niemitalo Apr 11 '18 at 6:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.