1
$\begingroup$

I am reading modulation from this site (am a beginner). In the end, they've given this example:

enter image description here

I am having trouble understanding how exactly they arrived at the two modulated results for AM and FM. I have attempted to understand it, and this is my attempt (I am assuming the $x$-axis is time axis):

  1. Amplitude Modulation: At each time $t=t_0$, they have taken an increase factor as $k=\frac{\text{amplitude of modulating wave at } t_0}{\text{constant amplitude of carrier wave}}$. Hence, to obtain the modulated result at each instant, they've done $\text{Final displacement}=\text{Original displacement of carrier wave}\times(1+k)$. Negative amplitude of modulating wave implies decrease of carrier wave's displacement, and positive amplitude of modulating wave implies increase.
  2. Frequency modulation: I'd say a similar increase factor is at work here, but instead, that factor is now affecting the frequency of the carrier wave instead of its amplitude.

I am sorry if these are beginner knowledge but I don't have any good book to study from. I checked Wikipedia for these two as well. My guess for amplitude modulation's working seems reasonably close to their mathematics, especially the $y(t)=[1+m(t)]\cdot c(t)$. But, I could not understand why an integral is employed in frequency modulation. What is it supposed to do?

I hope I have a reasonably detailed and specific question here. I am looking for simple language explanations. Thank you!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ @StanleyPawlukiewicz Thanks for your remark. Did you mean to link to the "Wide-band FM radio" section on that Wikipedia page? I read it and it mostly seems to be concerned with the "Armstrong slowly developed what eventually resulted in wide-band FM"..."Armstrong had a standing agreement to give RCA "..."However RCA, which was heavily invested in perfecting television broadcasting, chose not to invest in FM"..."Armstrong gave a formal presentation of his new system". Basically, all the "meta" aspects of its development are covered, so I am not sure how that answered my question. $\endgroup$ – Gaurang Tandon Feb 18 '18 at 4:48
  • $\begingroup$ @StanleyPawlukiewicz Thanks for your 2nd remark, but I still do not see how that helps me plot the graph for a resultant modulation given a carrier wave and the modulating wave. Sorry but I am a beginner. Thank you! $\endgroup$ – Gaurang Tandon Feb 18 '18 at 4:50
3
$\begingroup$

In order to understand the integral occurring in frequency modulation you need to understand the relation between phase and frequency. A sinusoid with frequency $f$ can be written as

$$x(t)=\sin(2\pi f t)\tag{1}$$

where the argument $2\pi f t$ is called the phase $\phi(t)$. The frequency is the derivative of the phase divided by $2\pi$:

$$f=\frac{1}{2\pi}\frac{d\phi(t)}{dt}\tag{2}$$

If the frequency is not constant, the relation $(2)$ still holds. Assume now that the frequency is a function of time $f(t)$. From ($2$), the phase can be determined from the frequency by integration:

$$\phi(t)=2\pi\int_{0}^tf(\tau)d\tau\tag{3}$$

In frequency modulation, the frequency of the carrier is changed according to the message signal $m(t)$ around a given (average) carrier frequency $f_c$:

$$f(t)=f_c+\Delta f\cdot m(t)\tag{4}$$

where $\Delta f$ is the maximum frequency deviation, assuming that $|m(t)|\le 1$. From $(3)$ and $(4)$ we can obtain the phase

$$\phi(t)=2\pi f_ct+2\pi\Delta f\int_0^tm(\tau)d\tau\tag{5}$$

From $(5)$, the frequency modulated signal can be written as

$$s(t)=\sin(\phi(t))=\sin\left(2\pi f_ct+2\pi\Delta f\int_0^tm(\tau)d\tau\right)\tag{6}$$


Your understanding of amplitude modulation seems to be correct. You simply multiply the carrier with a non-negative signal that is obtained from the message signal plus a constant. The constant must be chosen such that the sum remains positive.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your detailed answer! It is crystal clear to me. Please also add a short note on whether my interpretation of the amplitude modulation's formula was correct or not. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – Gaurang Tandon Feb 18 '18 at 16:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.