I want to derive the property of the Fourier Transform that states that if $X(j\omega) = \mathcal{F} (x(t))$ then $$\mathcal{F} \left( \int_{-\infty}^{t} x(\tau) \mathrm{d} \tau \right) = \frac{1}{j\omega} X(j\omega) + \pi X(0) \delta(\omega).$$ I started as follows, since $$x(t) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} X(j\omega) e^{j\omega t} \mathrm{d}\omega,$$ integrating both sides gives us $$\int_{-\infty}^{t} x(\tau) \mathrm{d} \tau = \int_{-\infty}^{t} \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} X(j\omega) e^{j\omega\tau} \mathrm{d}\omega\mathrm{d} \tau$$ $$\int_{-\infty}^{t} x(\tau) \mathrm{d} \tau = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} X(j\omega) \left(\int_{-\infty}^{t} e^{i\omega \tau} \mathrm{d}\tau \right) \mathrm{d}\omega.$$

How do I evaluate the inner integral inside the parantheses? My gut feeling says that it's related to the Fourier Transform of the constant function $y(t) = 1$ but I can't relate it to that since the upper limit is $t$ rather than $\infty$. How do I reach the result above?

Thank you in advance.


The actual derivation might be involved, instead here I would like to take the following simpler (but equivalent nevertheles) approach:

Let's define the integral $$\int_{-\infty}^{t} x(\tau) d\tau $$ as $$ x(t) \star u(t)$$ where $u(t)$ is the unit step function. Then from the convolution (in time) - multiplication (in frequency) property of the CTFT, one can get the following :

$$ \mathcal{F}\{ x(t)\star u(t) \} = X(\omega)U(\omega) $$ where $U(\omega)$ is the Fourier transform of the unit step function. Therefore your problem now in effect is reduced to the CTFT of the unit step. As most textbooks on S&S do, I'll also simply state the CTFT of the unit step function and conclude the derivation. Since $$U(\omega) = \frac{1}{j\omega} + \pi \delta(\omega) $$ then the Fourier transform of the integral of $x(t)$ is

$$ \mathcal{F}\{ \int_{-\infty}^{t} x(\tau) d\tau \} = \frac{ X(\omega) }{j\omega} + \pi X(0) \delta(\omega)$$

The last term results from the sifting property of the dirac impulse.

  • $\begingroup$ Which if course begs the question: "How did the textbook author come up with the CTFT of $u(t)$?" A cynic might answer "Copied it from an earlier text." $\endgroup$ – Dilip Sarwate Feb 9 '18 at 18:45
  • $\begingroup$ Not that deep I suppose! A related discusison was triggered even here by a question of MattL. But instead I prefer breaking $u(t)$ into an ac and dc part and consider adding the Fourier transforms separately. The ac part of $u(t)$ is the 0.5 sign(t) function whose CTFT is $1/jw$ where as the dc part is 0.5 whose CTFT is $\pi \delta(w)$. I find it enough for an intuitive understanding. The formalist could argue whether the decomposed terms whould be convergent individually or not. But that discussion belongs to generalized function theory then. $\endgroup$ – Fat32 Feb 9 '18 at 19:00
  • $\begingroup$ Your response just changes the question to finding the CTFT of $\frac 12 \sgn(t)$ which also must be found somehow. $\endgroup$ – Dilip Sarwate Feb 10 '18 at 2:32
  • $\begingroup$ @DilipSarwate, i know a lotta people just use "\text{sgn}", but the "correct" way to TeX a function that is not in the LaTeX library is with "\operatorname{.}". as with $$ \tfrac12 \operatorname{sgn}(t) $$ $\endgroup$ – robert bristow-johnson Feb 10 '18 at 2:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @robertbristow-johnson I didn't use "text{sgn}" but rather "\sgn(t)" under the assumption that sgn was a function known to LaTeX (like det and gcd and lim) but I guess I was wrong. It must have been a newcommand declaration that I always include in LaTeX files for non-stackexchange use. $\endgroup$ – Dilip Sarwate Feb 10 '18 at 2:58

As mentioned in Fat32's answer, the integration property can be derived directly from the Fourier transform of the unit step function.

I would like to show you how you can finish your derivation, even though you will also need the Fourier transform of the unit step. The integral

$$\int_{-\infty}^te^{j\omega \tau}d\tau\tag{1}$$

can be written as

$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}u(t-\tau)e^{j\omega\tau}d\tau=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}u(t+\tau)e^{-j\omega\tau}d\tau=\mathcal{F}_{\tau}\{u(t+\tau)\}=e^{j\omega t}U(\omega)\tag{2}$$

where $\mathcal{F}_{\tau}$ denotes the Fourier transform with $\tau$ as the independent time variable (and not $t$), and $U(\omega)$ is the Fourier transform of the unit step function $u(\tau)$.



and with $(1)$ and $(2)$ we get

$$\int_{-\infty}^te^{j\omega \tau}d\tau=e^{j\omega t}\left(\frac{1}{j\omega}+\pi\delta(\omega)\right)\tag{4}$$

and the last integral in your question becomes

$$\begin{align}\int_{-\infty}^{t} x(\tau) \mathrm{d} \tau &= \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} X(j\omega) \left(\int_{-\infty}^{t} e^{i\omega \tau} \mathrm{d}\tau \right) \mathrm{d}\omega\\&=\frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} X(j\omega)e^{j\omega t}\left(\frac{1}{j\omega}+\pi\delta(\omega)\right)d\omega\\&=\mathcal{F}^{-1}\left\{X(j\omega)\left(\frac{1}{j\omega}+\pi\delta(\omega)\right)\right\}\tag{5}\end{align}$$

from which it follows that

$$\mathcal{F}\left\{\int_{-\infty}^{t} x(\tau) \mathrm{d} \tau\right\}=X(j\omega)\left(\frac{1}{j\omega}+\pi\delta(\omega)\right)=X(j\omega)\frac{1}{j\omega}+\pi X(0)\delta(\omega)\tag{6}$$

What follows is a rather straightforward derivation of the Fourier transform of the unit step $u(t)$. If we accept without any further proof that the (generalized) derivative of the unit step is the Dirac delta impulse


we get the following relation for the Fourier transform of $u(t)$:

$$j\omega U(\omega)=1\tag{8}$$

From $(8)$ we can conclude that $U(\omega)$ must have the form


Multiplying $(9)$ with $j\omega$ gives


satisfying $(8)$ (because for any function $f(\omega)$ that is continuous at $\omega=0$ we have $f(\omega)\delta(\omega)=f(0)\delta(\omega)$.)

It only remains to determine the constant $c$ in $(9)$. This can be done by considering the value of the inverse Fourier transform of $U(\omega)$ at $t=0$. Since the inverse Fourier transform gives the average of the left-sided and of the right-sided limit, and since $u(0^-)=0$ and $u(0^+)=1$, we have


The Cauchy principal value of the integral of the first term on the right-hand side of $(10)$ vanishes because it is an odd function of $\omega$, so we're left with the second term:


from which $c=\pi$ follows. So from $(9)$ we finally get


  • $\begingroup$ That's convincing except for the Fourier Transform of the step function. How do we derive the Fourier Transform of the step function then? I believe Oppenheim derives the Fourier Transform of the step function using the very property that I asked about (the integration property), so it seems like a circular argument. I can "derive" the Fourier Transform of the constant function by considering its Fourier Series representation, but I can't do the same for $u(t)$ since it's not periodic. $\endgroup$ – 0MW Feb 9 '18 at 19:26
  • $\begingroup$ @0MW: There's a rather simple derivation similar to the one here (which is for the discrete-time case). I'll add it to my answer as soon as I have the time to do so. $\endgroup$ – Matt L. Feb 9 '18 at 21:41
  • $\begingroup$ @0MW: I added the derivation of the Fourier transform of $u(t)$ to my answer. $\endgroup$ – Matt L. Feb 10 '18 at 9:36
  • $\begingroup$ How can we conclude that equation (9) is true based on equation (8)? Why not just divide both sides by $j\omega$? $\endgroup$ – 0MW Feb 10 '18 at 15:38
  • $\begingroup$ I get that (9) satisfies (8) but how do we conclude (9) based on (8)? It's a bit counter-intuitive. $\endgroup$ – 0MW Feb 10 '18 at 15:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.