0
$\begingroup$

I was watching this video lecture on filters where this professor says that:

The phase of a cosine wave $\cos(\omega)$ is 0 till $\omega=\pi/2$. As soon as $\omega$ goes beyond $\pi/2$, i.e when $\cos(\omega)$ becomes negative, its phase becomes $\pi$.

I couldn't understand this. How can $\cos(\omega)$ have phase in itself if it is just a plain normal cosine function? What is the physical interpretation of this phase?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ See my comment below $\endgroup$ – Jazzmaniac Sep 27 '17 at 18:46
1
$\begingroup$

The statement in the video is, at best, misleading. Normally, when people speak of the "phase" of a sinusoidal function $\cos \omega$, they are talking about the value of $\omega$. For instance, when we say that a wave undergoes a "phase shift", we mean that the value of $\omega$ has changed. More information on this definition of the word "phase" is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase_(waves).

As noted by Jazzmaniac in comments, we could also try to interpret the statement by regarding the value of $\cos \omega$ as a complex number $z$. In polar representation we can write $z = |z| e^{i \phi}$ where $\phi$ is the phase of the number $z$. This use of the word "phase" is misleading in this context. For instance, applying a "phase shift" would mean that we multiply $\cos \omega$ by some complex number $e^{i \phi'}$. That certainly wouldn't implement a phase shift of the sinusoidal wave, though, in the usual sense.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It's not wrong, it just refers to a different definition of phase. The complex phase arg(cos(t)) behaves exactly like described. $\endgroup$ – Jazzmaniac Sep 27 '17 at 18:45
  • $\begingroup$ Could you elaborate a bit more please ? $\endgroup$ – Schimay Sep 27 '17 at 19:00
  • $\begingroup$ @Schimay, are you familiar with the polar representation of complex numbers? The phase of a complex number is just another name for the argument $\phi$ of its complex representation $z=|z| \exp(i \phi)$. $\endgroup$ – Jazzmaniac Sep 27 '17 at 19:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @AlexTP, it doesn't. Read the original post again. As the argument of the cosine crosses $\pi/2$, the phase jumps from $0$ to $\pi$. $\endgroup$ – Jazzmaniac Sep 27 '17 at 20:01
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Schimay To put it another way: a negative number $M$ can be written as $|M|e^{j\pi}$; i.e. every real negative number has phase $\pi$. $\endgroup$ – MBaz Sep 27 '17 at 20:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.