0
$\begingroup$

I am unable to differentiate GMSK and GFSK. How do the modulation techniques differ in Tx?

How do their receiving techniques differ..?

$\endgroup$

closed as too broad by Marcus Müller, lennon310, Laurent Duval, jojek May 14 '17 at 17:47

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ edaboard.com/thread5788.html $\endgroup$ – AlexTP May 14 '17 at 10:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ With GMSK the frequency modulation index is 0.5. With GFSK, the frequency modulation index is larger than 0.5 (the signaling tones are farther apart). $\endgroup$ – Andy Walls May 14 '17 at 10:19
  • $\begingroup$ @AndyWalls you should add this as an answer below, short answers are ok! $\endgroup$ – Dan Boschen May 14 '17 at 10:50
3
$\begingroup$

With GMSK the frequency modulation index is 0.5. With GFSK, the frequency modulation index is larger than 0.5 (the signaling tones are farther apart).

The receiving techniques used for GMSK as an FSK work for GFSK.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Welcome to SE...is this Andy "Mr. Storage" Walls of IBM? $\endgroup$ – Dan Boschen May 14 '17 at 11:06
  • $\begingroup$ @Dan_Boschen : Nope. I'm the Andy Walls that hangs around the GNURadio community and also the same one listed as the maintainer of the cx18 driver in the Linux kernel. $\endgroup$ – Andy Walls May 14 '17 at 11:59
  • $\begingroup$ Great, then your Andy "Mr cx18" Walls, then- I always get the two confused! Nice to meet you. $\endgroup$ – Dan Boschen May 14 '17 at 13:31

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.