4
$\begingroup$

How to find poles of transfer function by looking at the step response?

Given a step response graph like such: enter image description here

How would I find the sketch for its poles on the complex plane? The only thing I can gather are the rise time, settling time, overshoot, etc. But how do I derive the poles from that?

$\endgroup$

migrated from physics.stackexchange.com Sep 29 '12 at 23:20

This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.

  • $\begingroup$ Just by looking? Or are you able to Laplace transform it? $\endgroup$ – Colin K Sep 27 '12 at 2:51
  • $\begingroup$ @ColinK just by looking, the actual plot has numbers on the axis $\endgroup$ – mugetsu Sep 27 '12 at 2:52
  • $\begingroup$ Interesting question. An answer would provide a better intuition for the Laplace/Z transform than I currently have. $\endgroup$ – Colin K Sep 27 '12 at 2:57
  • $\begingroup$ This might help: facstaff.bucknell.edu/mastascu/econtrolhtml/Ident/… $\endgroup$ – Alfred Centauri Sep 27 '12 at 3:01
4
$\begingroup$

There are two things to determine: the frequency $f_n$ (or angular frequency $\omega_n$) and the $Q$. Approximately (for a high $Q$ system like the one pictured):

1) period $T$ is the time between successive peaks. $f_n=1/T$, and $\omega_n=2 \pi f_n$.

2) ratio of successive positive (or negative) peaks (measured relative to steady-state) $ 1- \delta = e^{-2 \pi /(2Q)} $, or, for high $Q$, $ Q \approx \frac{\pi}{\delta}$. [Example: If $\delta=0.1$ (10% amplitude decay per cycle), $Q \approx 30$.]

The poles are at $ \omega_n \left[-\frac{1}{2Q} \pm i \sqrt{1-\frac{1}{(2Q)^2}} \right] $, or in radial coordinates: $(\omega_n, \pi \pm \tan^{-1}{\sqrt{4Q^2-1}})$.

[There's also a pole at zero for the step response. Per bobuhito's comment, this pole is not part of the transfer function.]

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ the output has a pole at zero, but the transfer function does not $\endgroup$ – bobuhito Sep 27 '12 at 14:21
  • $\begingroup$ @bobuhito: Yes, good point. I'll edit appropriately. $\endgroup$ – Art Brown Sep 27 '12 at 15:17
0
$\begingroup$

The output here for t>0 looks like a constant plus a decaying sine wave, so mathematically it's the real part of $A+Be^{st}$ for three complex constants (A,B,s). Since the input for t>0 is a constant, the non-constant output is from a pole (that's the definition of pole: zero input for some s can have finite output for that s), so you just need to estimate s from the plot (you technically have two poles which are complex conjugates, as needed to create a "real part").

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.