0
$\begingroup$

I am a beginner to study about the filter notion and property

Being a real digital filter, (here "real filter" I means that its impulse response is real-valued)

this formula is established. But I have no idea how to prove it

$$ |H(\pi +w )|=|H(\pi -w)|$$

What should be $H(w)$ or $|H(w)| $ for generalized proof procedure?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

HINT:

From the definition of the DTFT

$$H(\omega)=\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}h[n]e^{-jn\omega}\tag{1}$$

derive the following facts:

  1. $H(\omega)=H(\omega+2\pi)$
  2. $H(\omega)=H^*(-\omega)$ for real-valued $h[n]$

where $*$ means complex conjugation. Combine these two results to prove the given equation.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Looking at OP's question he wants to show the relation between the "magnitudes" of $H(e^{j\omega})$ and for that purpose you can also add a 3rd hint as: $H(e^{j\omega}) = |H(e^{j\omega})| e^{j\phi(\omega)}$, from which he can translate relations of 1 and 2 into the relations of magnitudes. $\endgroup$ – Fat32 Mar 23 '16 at 18:15
  • $\begingroup$ @Fat32 and Matt L. For all your help :), I can reach the conclusion, I really appreciate for hints and comments !!! In conclusion, $H(\pi+w) = H^{*}(\pi -w) $ and magnitude used $\endgroup$ – user2874612 Mar 24 '16 at 2:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.