I think it is an easy question but I am stuck.

I want to derive that $$ \alpha = -e^{\frac{-T}{\tau}}\,. $$

Can someone provide me with an answer?

[EDIT] Sorry guys, this was really a senseless question. Here are some more informations. The differential equation of the EWMA: $$y(n)=\alpha\cdot x(n)+(1-\alpha)y(n-1)$$ and the corresponding frequency magnitude response: $$H_E(z)=\frac{\alpha}{1-(1-\alpha)z^{-1}}$$ and in the frequency domain for $\omega_s=1 \rightarrow T=1 $ : $$H_E(\omega)=\frac{\alpha}{\sqrt{1-2(1-\alpha)\cos(\omega)+(1-\alpha)^2}}$$ $$\tau=\frac{1}{2\pi\omega_{3dB}}$$

Hence $$H_E(\omega_{3dB})=\frac{\alpha}{\sqrt{1-2(1-\alpha)\cos(\omega_{3dB})+(1-\alpha)^2}}\overset!=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\text.$$

I'm looking for $\alpha$, given an $\omega_{3dB}$.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You will have to explain what $\alpha$ should be. Also, if you ask me, a moving average can't be exponentially weighted -- otherwise, it wouldn't really be an average (by the usual definition of average), but just a low pass filter. $\endgroup$ – Marcus Müller Jan 16 '16 at 12:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "can someone provide me with an answer?": Probably, yes, but you have not asked a question! $\endgroup$ – Marcus Müller Jan 16 '16 at 12:50

If I understood you correctly, you want to compute the value of $\alpha$ that results in a specified 3dB cut-off frequency for an exponentially weighted moving average filter. If you square your last equation, you get


which can be rearranged into the following quadratic equation:


with the positive solution

$$\alpha = \cos(\omega_c)-1+\sqrt{\cos^2(\omega_c)-4\cos(\omega_c)+3}\tag{3} $$

So, e.g., for a desired cut-off frequency $\omega_c=0.2\pi$, you obtain from $(3)$ a value of $\alpha=0.455886780102867$. The figure below shows the magnitude of the frequency response of the resulting exponentially weighted moving average filter, from which you can see that the desired cut-off frequency is achieved.

enter image description here

EDIT: The formula for $\alpha$ in your question should actually be

$$\alpha=1-e^{-T/\tau},\qquad \tau=1/\Omega_c\tag{4}$$

Note that unlike $\omega_c$ in Eq. $(3)$, $\Omega_c$ in Eq. $(4)$ is not normalized by the sampling frequency. So we have $-T/\tau=-\Omega_cT=-\omega_c$.

Eq. $(4)$ is an approximation, and it comes from applying the impulse invariant transformation to the continuous-time transfer function


which has a 3dB cut-off frequency $\omega_c=1/\tau$. Applying the impulse invariant transformation to $(5)$ gives


Comparing the denominator of $(6)$ with the denominator of the discrete-time transfer function of an EWMA filter


results in the given formula. Note, however, that this is only an approximation. Especially for cut-off frequencies close to Nyquist, the error of formula $(4)$ becomes relatively large.

  • $\begingroup$ Hey Matt, thanks for your help. Your formula is correct, but I also found the relation: $$ \alpha = -e^{\frac{-T}{\tau}}\,. $$ And now I am wondering how to get from yours to mine... $\endgroup$ – Slev1n Jan 17 '16 at 10:25
  • $\begingroup$ @Slev1n: I've updated my answer to explain where that approximation comes from. Note that it is not exact, unlike the formula in my answer. $\endgroup$ – Matt L. Jan 17 '16 at 13:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.