There are several functions for which we know that Fourier Transform will exist but still we calculate its Laplace Transform. Can I know the reason why we need to take Laplace transform for which we know its convergence?
Thanks
Signal Processing Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for practitioners of the art and science of signal, image and video processing. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityThere are several functions for which we know that Fourier Transform will exist but still we calculate its Laplace Transform. Can I know the reason why we need to take Laplace transform for which we know its convergence?
Thanks
There is a large class of functions for which both the Fourier transform and the Laplace transform exist, and for which one can be obtained from the other by setting $s=j\omega$. (Note that even when both exist, the latter need not be the case). So for this class of functions, obtaining the Laplace transform from the Fourier transform (or vice versa) does not require any additional work.
Example: $$\begin{align}x(t)&=e^{-at}u(t),\quad a>0\\ \text{Fourier transform:}\quad X(j\omega)&=\frac{1}{j\omega +a}\\ \text{Laplace transform:}\quad X(s)&=\frac{1}{s +a},\quad |s|> -a\end{align}$$
What the Laplace transform offers is a description in the complex $s$-plane, such as poles and zeros of transfer functions, from which many system properties can be easily deduced. The Fourier transform only shows the behavior on the frequency axis (i.e., the spectrum).
As I understand (I'm newb in the spectral analysis), using of Laplace Transform is a good idea if you are going to analyze transient signals, because it uses damped exponents as basis.