1
$\begingroup$

Suppose $x_c(t)$ is a periodic continuous time signal with period 1 ms and for which the Fourier series is

\begin{align*} x_c(t) &= \sum\limits_{k=-9}^9 a_k e^{j(2000 \pi k t)} \\ \end{align*}

The Fourier series coefficients $a_k$ are zero for $|k| > 9$. $x_c(t)$ is discretely sampled such that:

\begin{align*} x[n] &= x_c\left(\frac{n}{6000}\right) \\ &= \sum\limits_{k=-9}^9 a_k e^{j(\pi k n/3)} \\ \end{align*}

$x[n]$ is periodic with $N=6$

Question: Find the DFS coefficients of $x[n]$ in terms of $a_k$.

My Work: The DFS coefficients of a periodic signal are:

\begin{align*} W_N &= e^{-j(2\pi/N)} \\ X[k] &= \sum\limits_{n=0}^{N-1} x[n] W_N^{kn} \\ \end{align*}

Changing the variable $k$ in $x[n]$ to $m$ to avoid conflict and combining yields:

\begin{align*} X[k] &= \sum\limits_{n=0}^{N-1} \sum\limits_{m=-9}^9 a_m e^{j(\pi m n/3)} W_N^{kn} \\ X[k] &= \sum\limits_{n=0}^{N-1} \sum\limits_{m=-9}^9 a_m e^{j(\pi n/3 (m - k))} \\ \end{align*}

I'm stumped on how to simplify or process this further.

I suspect this is the wrong approach. The problem gives Fourier series coefficients of the continuous function, there should be a direct way to convert them to the discrete Fourier series coefficients.

Textbook Answer: The answer given by the textbook is as follows. I am trying to figure out how to get to this answer.

\begin{align*} X[k] &= 2\pi \begin{cases} a_0 + a_6 + a_{-6} & k = 0 \\ a_1 + a_7 + a_{-5} & k = 1 \\ a_2 + a_8 + a_{-4} & k = 2 \\ a_3 + a_9 + a_{-3} + a_{-9} & k = 3 \\ a_4 + a_{-2} + a_{-8} & k = 4 \\ a_5 + a_{-1} + a_{-7} & k = 5 \\ \end{cases} \end{align*}

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Can you double-check if it is not $N$ instead of $2\pi$ in the $X[k]$ equation ? $\endgroup$ – Gilles Oct 21 '15 at 12:15
  • $\begingroup$ The textbook solution for $X[k]$ absolutely has $2\pi$ not $N$. $N=6$, btw, so the variable wouldn't be necessary. $\endgroup$ – clay Oct 21 '15 at 13:18
1
$\begingroup$

Your result

$$x[n]=\sum_{k=-9}^9a_ke^{j2\pi kn/N}\tag{1}$$

with $N=6$ is correct. If you compare $(1)$ to the IDFT (or DFS)

$$x[n]=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{k=0}^{N-1}X[k]e^{j2\pi kn/N}\tag{2}$$

you'll notice that in $(2)$ each term $e^{j2\pi kn/N}$ occurs only once for each value of $k$ (for fixed $n$), whereas in $(1)$, due to the periodicity of the complex exponential, each term $e^{j2\pi kn/N}$ occurs several times. E.g., for $k=0$ in $(2)$, in $(1)$ you get contributions for $k=0$, for $k=6$, and for $k=-6$ (because $N=6$). Consequently, comparing $(1)$ and $(2)$ gives

$$X[0]=N(a_0+a_6+a_{-6})$$

For all other values of $k$, the procedure is completely analogous: search for indices $k$ in $(1)$ which have the same complex exponential term $e^{j2\pi kn/N}$. You basically have to keep adding and subtracting the number $N=6$ to the indices, as long you remain in the range $|k|\le 9$, so e.g. for $X[2]$ you get contributions for $k=2$, $k=2+6=8$, and $k=2-6=-4$, because they all have the same exponential term $e^{j4\pi n/N}$.

PS: The term $2\pi$ in your textbook result doesn't make sense to me, it should be $N$, as already pointed out in a comment.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.