0
$\begingroup$

I have a few questions about this assignment I am solving. It is q3.33(a) from oppenheim's DSP book 2nd edition.

basically, the question gives you a pole zero plot, from which I was able to determine the correct x[n]. (Couple classmates confirmed my answer on that).

and it also gives you the y[n] of the form $(0.5)^n \cdot x[n]$.

And wants you to work out a pole-zero of y[n] in the z plane.

my question is this: given that I already know X[z], can i just do z transform of $0.5^n$ as if it was $a^n \cdot u[n]$?

Then I will have $[\frac{1}{1-0.5z^{-1}}] \cdot X[z]$

Thanks everyone.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ are you sure that "$*$" ain't a convolution symbol? $$ y[n] = \left(\frac12\right)^n \circledast x[n] $$ might very well be LTI with a Z Transform and poles and zeros (it might need a unit step function in there). but $$ y[n] = \left(\frac12\right)^n \cdot x[n] $$ is not LTI. i was gonna edit your question for clarity, but i better not if i don't know what you're saying. $\endgroup$ – robert bristow-johnson Oct 5 '14 at 19:05
  • $\begingroup$ @robertbristow-johnson thanks, I am pretty new at the formatting of equation SE uses and had no idea how to do the dot or the convolution sign. And my DSP book uses * for convolution so I just wanted to avoid confusion. $\endgroup$ – D.Zou Oct 5 '14 at 19:08
  • $\begingroup$ @robertbristow-johnson It's fixed now. $\endgroup$ – D.Zou Oct 5 '14 at 19:11
  • $\begingroup$ well, there is no Z transform transfer function if it's multiplication. if it's multiplication in one domain, it has to be convolution in the other domain. "poles and zeros" mean multiplication in normally the "frequency domain" or the "Z domain", but that would mean it's convolution in the $x[n],y[n]$ domain. $\endgroup$ – robert bristow-johnson Oct 5 '14 at 19:23
  • $\begingroup$ so I can't do Z[ab] = Z[a]Z[b] $\endgroup$ – D.Zou Oct 5 '14 at 19:49
0
$\begingroup$

HINT:

Use the property

$$z_0^nx[n]\Longleftrightarrow X(z/z_0)$$

with $z_0=1/2$. You can find this property in Table 3.2 on page 126. It's quite straightforward to show this property by using the definition of the $\mathcal{Z}$-transform.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.