up vote 0 down vote favorite

Some posts evocate the computation of convolution or cross-correlation using FFT and zero-padding the temporal signal.

I want to compute the autocorrelation of a 3D array using FFTW (2 dimensions are periodic). The file is very large (dimension 256*256*49995, double precision, 25GB).

1 : Is padding necessary for periodic dimensions?

2 : Is it possible to avoid zero-padding to limit memory usage? (fftw++ seems to answer yes)

3 : From the 3d FFT of the non-padded signal, is it possible to compute the cross-correlation using a Discrete Cosine Transform? 

Cross-correlation = DCT[ FFT(signal)*Conjugate(FFT(signal)) ]

EDIT - 4 : Is it mandatory to use a mask?

Thanks

share|improve this question
  • It would be helpful if you give a little more information about what it is you wish to compute. It would appear that you have 49995 images of size 256x256. Each image would have a 2D autocorrelation function which might be an aperiodic autocorrelation if you zero-pad, or a periodic autocorrelation if you don't want to zero-pad. What do you want to do with these 49995 autocorrelation functions of size 256x256 or 512x512? Treat the numbers in each bin as a different time series of length 49995 and calculate the autocorrelation function (periodic or aperiodic) of each series? If not, what? – Dilip Sarwate Aug 29 '14 at 16:14
  • @DilipSarwate : From a CFD simulation, I have extracted some planes at a given y position during time. I want to compute the spatio-temporal correlation which is the average of f(x,z,t)*f(x+dx,z+dz,t+dt). The field is periodic in x and z so I need periodic autocorrelation in x and z (256*256). However, it is not periodic in time. – user1824346 Aug 29 '14 at 16:39

Your Answer

 
discard

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.