0
$\begingroup$

Does modified Morlet wavelet function satisfy the admissibility condition ?
Do you have any reference for the answer please.
Thanks.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

No, it doesn't (at least not in theory). You know that the admissibility condition is

$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{|\Psi(\omega)|^2}{|\omega|}d\omega<\infty$$

where $\Psi(\omega)$ is the Fourier transform of the mother wavelet $\psi(t)$. If $\Psi(\omega)$ decays sufficiently fast (which is the case for the Morlet wavelet) then the admissibility condition reduces to $\Psi(0)=0$, i.e. $\psi(t)$ must satisfy a zero-mean condition. However, this condition is not satisfied for the Morlet wavelet. So the Morlet wavelet is not admissible, but in practice this is no problem because $\Psi(0)$ is very small.

[1] M. Vetterli, J. Kovačević: Wavelets and Subband Coding

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I think there are 2 definitions for Morlet function. first one is $ \psi (t)= \frac{1}{ \sqrt{ \pi f_{b} } } \big( e^{j2\pi f_{c}t}- e^{-f_{b}(\pi f_{c})^{2}} \big) e^{ \frac{-t^{2}}{f_{b}} }$. The second definition is $ \psi (t)= \frac{1}{ \sqrt{ \pi f_{b} } } e^{j2\pi f_{c}t} e^{ \frac{-t^{2}}{f_{b}} }$ So I guess it's not admissible for the 2nd definition. Do you agree? @matt-l $\endgroup$ – Electricman Jul 1 '14 at 8:43
  • $\begingroup$ @Electricman: Yes, the first one has a correction term to make the original Morlet wavelet (your second formula) admissible. $\endgroup$ – Matt L. Jul 1 '14 at 9:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.